Jakub Paul vs David Pichler — Cassis CH Qualifying Round 2

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
SUI2
Jakub Paul
#543ATP
1389ELO
1340Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 September 2025
hard
AUT
David Pichler
#1053ATP
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Paul J.
7-5 6-1
Pichler D.
Paul J.
762
Pichler D.
510

Jakub Paul defeated David Pichler 7-5 6-1 in the Cassis CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jakub Paul came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul J.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Pichler D.

Pichler D.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Serve advantage — Paul J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Paul J.Pichler D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.7
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (65 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul J.Pichler D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
0
Break points saved·Dominant
62
27
Break points won·Even
20
17
Deciding sets·Even
5
9
Tiebreaks·
85
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paul J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pichler D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
1.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.7
Minutes 14d
9.0
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
De Schepper K.
Moroni F.[6]
3-67-57-5
Engel J.[1]
Corwin F.[9]
6-16-0
Pieczkowski O.[4]
Kingsley C.[10]
7-56-4
Janvier M.[7]
Tepmahc N.
6-41-66-0
Paul J.[2]
Pichler D.
7-56-1
Stewart H.[3]
Gerasimov E.[8]
6-41-66-3
Q1
Tepmahc N.
Vylegzhanin N.[5]
6-26-4
De Schepper K.
Catry R.[12]
6-16-3
Kingsley C.[10]
Vandermeersch C.
2-66-36-1
Pieczkowski O.[4]
Covato M.
6-787-56-3
Gerasimov E.[8]
Tailleu P.
6-36-4
Moroni F.[6]
Maxted L.
2-67-56-4
Engel J.[1]
Salvestre D.
6-46-4
Corwin F.[9]
Cardinaud H.
6-36-3
Paul J.[2]
Wallart E.
6-47-64
Pichler D.
Reymond A.[11]
6-26-4
Stewart H.[3]
Raquillet L.
6-26-3
Janvier M.[7]
Car H.
6-33-66-2