Milos Karol vs Lukas Klein — Istanbul CH Round of 16

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SVK
Milos Karol
#445ATP
1393ELO
1333Hard ELO
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 September 2025
hard
Lukas Klein
SVK1
Lukas Klein
#171ATP
1601ELO
1535Hard ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Karol M.
6-7 6-2 7-5
Klein L.
Karol M.
66672
Klein L.
78251

Milos Karol defeated Lukas Klein 6-7 6-2 7-5 in the Istanbul CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Karol M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Karol M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Karol M.Klein L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Karol M.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
11
39
Break points saved·Clear edge
75
92
Break points won·Slight edge
7
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
2
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Karol M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Klein L.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.4Hard Elo 1333
Surface ELO
7.6+202 Hard Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1393
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1601
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.0
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Molcan A.
Mejia N.
7-696-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.
Potenza L.
6-36-1
Molcan A.
Sakellaridis S.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Mejia N.
Karol M.
6-27-61
Potenza L.
Hemery C.[6]
6-47-65
Sakellaridis S.
Grenier H.[7]
7-56-736-2
Molcan A.
Shelbayh A.
4-66-17-65
R16
Karol M.
Klein L.[1]
6-766-27-5
Mejia N.
Gengel M.
7-683-66-2
Hemery C.[6]
Turker M.
6-23-66-3
Shelbayh A.
Durasovic V.
6-46-0
Potenza L.
Gombos N.
7-56-3
Molcan A.
Landaluce M.[3]
6-36-4
Grenier H.[7]
Gray A.
6-716-16-2
Sakellaridis S.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-23-1
R32
Gray A.
Huesler M.
6-32-66-4
Karol M.
Krajci M.
6-36-2
Gombos N.
Pacheco Mendez R.[9]
6-22-67-65
Potenza L.
Kirci K.
7-57-5
Turker M.
Arinc K.
7-636-2
Hemery C.[6]
Makk P.
6-46-4
Landaluce M.[3]
Ursu V.
6-36-0
Virtanen O.[2]
Kotov P.
6-46-2
Sakellaridis S.
Langmo C.
4-66-36-4
Shelbayh A.
Echargui M.[5]
6-46-4
Gengel M.
Hassan B.[8]
6-43-66-2
Grenier H.[7]
Hernandez Serrano J.
7-656-3
Klein L.[1]
Purtseladze S.
6-46-3
Durasovic V.
Rosenkranz M.
7-656-3
Mejia N.
Ivashka I.
6-22-1
Molcan A.
Nedelko I.
6-41-0