Philip Sekulic vs Bernard Tomic — Zhangjiagang CH Round of 32

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Philip Sekulic
#317ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 August 2025
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS1
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Sekulic P.
6-1 1-6 7-6
Tomic B.
Sekulic P.
61782
Tomic B.
16661

Philip Sekulic defeated Bernard Tomic 6-1 1-6 7-6 in the Zhangjiagang CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Philip Sekulic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 1–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sekulic P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Serve advantage — Tomic B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sekulic P.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sekulic P.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
92
Break points won·Slight edge
9
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
19
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sekulic P.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Tomic B.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.1Hard Elo 1363
Surface ELO
6.9+78 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1390
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
4.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.9
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
4.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sekulic P.Tomic B.
Freshness·Slight edge
92
81

Sekulic P.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Tomic B.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Crawford O.[6]
6-33-67-5
Semi-finals
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Uchiyama Y.[5]
6-37-65
Crawford O.[6]
Isomura K.
7-616-0
Quarter-finals
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Uchida K.
6-36-4
Isomura K.
Sin S.
2-66-26-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Simakin I.[7]
6-46-3
Crawford O.[6]
Tokuda R.
7-613-66-2
R16
Crawford O.[6]
Moriya H.
6-34-66-4
Tokuda R.
Sekulic P.
6-46-4
Sin S.
Sun F.[4]
6-36-1
Isomura K.
Cui J.
3-66-27-69
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Huang T.
6-26-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Peliwo F.
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Noguchi R.[2]
6-17-64
Simakin I.[7]
Charlton J.
6-46-4
R32
Sekulic P.
Tomic B.[1]
6-11-67-66
Charlton J.
Te R.
6-46-776-4
Tokuda R.
Binda A.
5-76-36-3
Moriya H.
Yevseyev D.
6-24-66-4
Isomura K.
Fomin S.
6-36-2
Simakin I.[7]
Wu T.
6-47-61
Peliwo F.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-16-2
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Kikuchi Y.
6-25-76-1
Uchida K.
Castelnuovo L.
7-646-3
Noguchi R.[2]
Xiao L.
7-666-1
Sun F.[4]
Mo Y.
3-66-36-4
Crawford O.[6]
Imamura M.
6-36-2
Sin S.
Shin W.
7-57-64
Cui J.
Gea A.[8]
5-77-646-0
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Watt J.
6-43-66-2
Huang T.
Uesugi K.
6-16-743-2