Josy Daems vs Joy De Zeeuw — W50 Oldenzaal Round of 16

W50 Oldenzaal · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Josy Daems
#546WTA
1297ELO
1251Clay ELO
20 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 August 2025
clay
NED
Joy De Zeeuw
#953WTA
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLWL
Daems J.
6-4 6-3
De Zeeuw J.
Daems J.
662
De Zeeuw J.
43–

Josy Daems defeated Joy De Zeeuw 6-4 6-3 in the W50 Oldenzaal round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Josy Daems closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Daems J.serving47% hold

wins 49% of points on serve vs De Zeeuw J.

De Zeeuw J.serving45% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Daems J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daems J.De Zeeuw J.
1st serve in·Even
66%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
44%
Service points won·Even
55%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Daems J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
De Zeeuw J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.5
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Noha Akugue N.
Ambrosio S.
7-677-65
Semi-finals
Noha Akugue N.
Schmidt A.
6-46-1
Ambrosio S.
Daems J.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Daems J.
Van Den Broek I.
6-16-2
Schmidt A.
Van Impe A.
6-34-66-3
Ambrosio S.
Ebeling Koning L.
6-17-5
Noha Akugue N.
Visscher S.
6-16-3
R16
Daems J.
De Zeeuw J.
6-46-3
Visscher S.
Stoiber R.
6-26-2
Schmidt A.
Hodzic M.
6-26-736-4
Ambrosio S.
Kazionova E.
6-46-3
Ebeling Koning L.
Rame A.
6-36-4
Van Den Broek I.
Avdeeva J.
3-66-46-0
Noha Akugue N.
Schunk N.
3-66-26-3
Van Impe A.
Raschdorf C.
6-26-4
R32
Stoiber R.
Oz I.
6-16-2
Schmidt A.
Meyer Auf Der Heide L.
6-16-3
Hodzic M.
Curmi F.
6-37-67
Visscher S.
Tran L.
6-21-2
Noha Akugue N.
Van Emst S.
7-643-66-4
Daems J.
Vrancken Peeters A.
6-36-4
Ambrosio S.
De Koning R.
6-46-3
Schunk N.
Du Pree B.
6-46-1
Avdeeva J.
Hageman M.
6-26-1
Raschdorf C.
Nahimana S.
6-36-3
De Zeeuw J.
Sandberg V.
6-46-1
Kazionova E.
Ahti V.
6-16-2
Van Impe A.
Morderger T.
6-26-4
Rame A.
Ekshibarova V.
6-25-76-2
Ebeling Koning L.
Herrmann S.
6-16-3