Max Schoenhaus vs Jakub Nicod — Augsburg CH Round of 32

Augsburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Max Schoenhaus
#320ATP
1508ELO
1467Clay ELO
18 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 18 August 2025
clay
CZE
Jakub Nicod
#731ATP
21 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLW
Schoenhaus M.
1-6 7-6 3-2
Nicod J.
Schoenhaus M.
1773–
Nicod J.
6642–

Max Schoenhaus advanced when Jakub Nicod retired 1-6 7-6 3-2 in the Augsburg CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Schoenhaus M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nicod J.

Nicod J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Schoenhaus M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Schoenhaus M.Nicod J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Schoenhaus M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nicod J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Schoenhaus M.Nicod J.
Freshness·
88
—

Schoenhaus M.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 40 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Stebe C.
Ritschard A.[8]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Ritschard A.[8]
Squire H.
6-34-66-2
Stebe C.
Kolar Z.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.
Cerny M.
6-03-1
Kolar Z.
Sanchez Martinez B.
6-16-1
Squire H.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[6]
6-36-3
Ritschard A.[8]
Negritu C.[2]
6-44-66-4
R16
Cerny M.
Paroulek T.
6-757-646-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[6]
Dedura Palomero D.
6-27-66
Squire H.
Montes De La Torre I.
2-66-26-4
Ritschard A.[8]
Schoenhaus M.
7-640-67-63
Negritu C.[2]
Popovic S.
6-767-56-4
Sanchez Martinez B.
Bailly G.
6-37-66
Stebe C.
Gadamauri B.
6-24-67-66
Kolar Z.
Barton H.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Schoenhaus M.
Nicod J.
1-67-643-2
Gadamauri B.
Berrettini J.
6-737-667-62
Paroulek T.
Denolly C.[7]
6-27-62
Dedura Palomero D.
Martin A.
6-26-0
Bailly G.
Prado Angelo J.[1]
6-34-66-4
Sanchez Martinez B.
Masur D.
6-37-5
Kolar Z.
Mikrut L.
6-26-3
Barton H.[5]
Petkovic M.
6-26-4
Cerny M.
Strombachs R.
3-67-667-5
Montes De La Torre I.
Zahraj P.[3]
6-46-4
Ritschard A.[8]
Molleker R.
6-16-2
Popovic S.
Ehrenschneider N.
6-37-67
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[6]
Brancaccio R.
7-643-66-3
Stebe C.
Poljicak M.[4]
6-10-66-0
Squire H.
Torres J.
7-57-64
Negritu C.[2]
Marterer M.
6-34-66-2