Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Bu Yunchaokete — Winston-Salem Quarter-final

Winston-Salem · ATP · Quarter-final
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#54ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2025
hard
CHN
Bu Yunchaokete
1709ELO
1644Hard ELO
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-3 5-7 6-3
Yunchaokete B.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6562
Yunchaokete B.
3731

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Bu Yunchaokete 6-3 5-7 6-3 in the Winston-Salem quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Yunchaokete B.

Yunchaokete B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Yunchaokete B.
41
Serve
24
43
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Yunchaokete B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Even
6.1
6.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 72). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Yunchaokete B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
36
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Dominant
68
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
38
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Yunchaokete B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+67 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1644
6.7Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1709
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Yunchaokete B.
Freshness·Even
89
85

Van De Zandschulp B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Yunchaokete B.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.
Korda S.[11]
W/O
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[11]
Kecmanovic M.[13]
6-16-4
Fucsovics M.
Munar J.[12]
7-56-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Medjedovic H.
7-686-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Yunchaokete B.
6-35-76-3
R16
Yunchaokete B.
Navone M.
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-3
Munar J.[12]
Sonego L.[5]
4-66-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Muller A.[8]
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-1
Korda S.[11]
Majchrzak K.
6-736-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Diallo G.[4]
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Baez S.[10]
0-66-16-4
R32
Diallo G.[4]
Basavareddy N.
W/O
Fucsovics M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
6-34-66-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Oconnell C.
6-40-0
Van De Zandschulp B.
Arnaldi M.[6]
6-36-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Martinez P.
2-66-37-63
Yunchaokete B.
Tsitsipas S.[1]
6-36-2
Munar J.[12]
Bellucci M.
6-36-1
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-65
Majchrzak K.
Borges N.[7]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Giron M.[16]
6-26-2
Baez S.[10]
Carreno Busta P.
7-56-2
Darderi L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
7-656-766-4
Sonego L.[5]
Dostanic S.
6-36-727-63
Korda S.[11]
Kopriva V.
6-36-4
Muller A.[8]
Blanch D.
6-736-37-5
Medjedovic H.
Fearnley J.[15]
6-47-62
R64
Blanch D.
Coric B.
6-47-65
Kovacevic A.
Misolic F.
7-627-68
Van De Zandschulp B.
Walton A.
2-67-56-3
Carreno Busta P.
Nishioka Y.
6-06-3
Navone M.
Suresh D.
6-36-3
Basavareddy N.
Collignon R.
6-27-62
Dostanic S.
Vukic A.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Holt B.
6-46-727-62
Fucsovics M.
Gaston H.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.
Jarry N.
7-666-4
Oconnell C.
Safiullin R.
6-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-69
Kopriva V.
Ofner S.
3-66-46-3
Yunchaokete B.
Tseng C.
6-726-37-64
Martinez P.
Goffin D.
6-36-3
Bellucci M.
Comesana F.
6-46-3