Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Adam Walton — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#54ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2025
hard
Adam Walton
AUS
Adam Walton
#85ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLWWWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
2-6 7-5 6-3
Walton A.
Van De Zandschulp B.
2762
Walton A.
6531

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Adam Walton 2-6 7-5 6-3 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #54, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Walton A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Walton A.
41
Serve
35
43
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Walton A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.0
6.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Walton A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
77
65
Break points saved·Even
98
95
Break points won·Dominant
68
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
96
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
80
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Walton A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+42 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1669
6.2Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1703
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.9
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Walton A.
Freshness·Dominant
87
62

Van De Zandschulp B.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Walton A.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 64 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.
Korda S.[11]
W/O
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[11]
Kecmanovic M.[13]
6-16-4
Fucsovics M.
Munar J.[12]
7-56-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Medjedovic H.
7-686-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Yunchaokete B.
6-35-76-3
R16
Yunchaokete B.
Navone M.
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-3
Munar J.[12]
Sonego L.[5]
4-66-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Muller A.[8]
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-1
Korda S.[11]
Majchrzak K.
6-736-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Diallo G.[4]
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Baez S.[10]
0-66-16-4
R32
Diallo G.[4]
Basavareddy N.
W/O
Fucsovics M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
6-34-66-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Oconnell C.
6-40-0
Van De Zandschulp B.
Arnaldi M.[6]
6-36-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Martinez P.
2-66-37-63
Yunchaokete B.
Tsitsipas S.[1]
6-36-2
Munar J.[12]
Bellucci M.
6-36-1
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-65
Majchrzak K.
Borges N.[7]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Giron M.[16]
6-26-2
Baez S.[10]
Carreno Busta P.
7-56-2
Darderi L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
7-656-766-4
Sonego L.[5]
Dostanic S.
6-36-727-63
Korda S.[11]
Kopriva V.
6-36-4
Muller A.[8]
Blanch D.
6-736-37-5
Medjedovic H.
Fearnley J.[15]
6-47-62
R64
Blanch D.
Coric B.
6-47-65
Kovacevic A.
Misolic F.
7-627-68
Van De Zandschulp B.
Walton A.
2-67-56-3
Carreno Busta P.
Nishioka Y.
6-06-3
Navone M.
Suresh D.
6-36-3
Basavareddy N.
Collignon R.
6-27-62
Dostanic S.
Vukic A.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Holt B.
6-46-727-62
Fucsovics M.
Gaston H.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.
Jarry N.
7-666-4
Oconnell C.
Safiullin R.
6-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-69
Kopriva V.
Ofner S.
3-66-46-3
Yunchaokete B.
Tseng C.
6-726-37-64
Martinez P.
Goffin D.
6-36-3
Bellucci M.
Comesana F.
6-46-3