Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard — Winston-Salem Semi-final

Winston-Salem · ATP · Semi-final
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#54ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2025
hard
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
FRA9
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
#83ATP
1738ELO
1672Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$3.5MCAREER
23 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-4 7-5
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Van De Zandschulp B.
672
Mpetshi Perricard G.
450

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard 6-4 7-5 in the Winston-Salem semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #54, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Mpetshi Perricard G.

Mpetshi Perricard G.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Mpetshi Perricard G.
41
Serve
81
43
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Mpetshi Perricard G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
70%
Return points won·Clear edge
39%
27%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
68%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
14.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Mpetshi Perricard G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
77
65
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Dominant
68
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
80
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+39 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1672
5.6Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1738
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Mpetshi Perricard G.
Freshness·Slight edge
87
94

Van De Zandschulp B.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Mpetshi Perricard G.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.
Korda S.[11]
W/O
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[11]
Kecmanovic M.[13]
6-16-4
Fucsovics M.
Munar J.[12]
7-56-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Medjedovic H.
7-686-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Yunchaokete B.
6-35-76-3
R16
Yunchaokete B.
Navone M.
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-3
Munar J.[12]
Sonego L.[5]
4-66-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Muller A.[8]
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-1
Korda S.[11]
Majchrzak K.
6-736-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Diallo G.[4]
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Baez S.[10]
0-66-16-4
R32
Diallo G.[4]
Basavareddy N.
W/O
Fucsovics M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
6-34-66-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Oconnell C.
6-40-0
Van De Zandschulp B.
Arnaldi M.[6]
6-36-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Martinez P.
2-66-37-63
Yunchaokete B.
Tsitsipas S.[1]
6-36-2
Munar J.[12]
Bellucci M.
6-36-1
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-65
Majchrzak K.
Borges N.[7]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Giron M.[16]
6-26-2
Baez S.[10]
Carreno Busta P.
7-56-2
Darderi L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
7-656-766-4
Sonego L.[5]
Dostanic S.
6-36-727-63
Korda S.[11]
Kopriva V.
6-36-4
Muller A.[8]
Blanch D.
6-736-37-5
Medjedovic H.
Fearnley J.[15]
6-47-62
R64
Blanch D.
Coric B.
6-47-65
Kovacevic A.
Misolic F.
7-627-68
Van De Zandschulp B.
Walton A.
2-67-56-3
Carreno Busta P.
Nishioka Y.
6-06-3
Navone M.
Suresh D.
6-36-3
Basavareddy N.
Collignon R.
6-27-62
Dostanic S.
Vukic A.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Holt B.
6-46-727-62
Fucsovics M.
Gaston H.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.
Jarry N.
7-666-4
Oconnell C.
Safiullin R.
6-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-69
Kopriva V.
Ofner S.
3-66-46-3
Yunchaokete B.
Tseng C.
6-726-37-64
Martinez P.
Goffin D.
6-36-3
Bellucci M.
Comesana F.
6-46-3