Hamad Medjedovic vs Arthur Rinderknech — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB
Hamad Medjedovic
#68ATP
1841ELO
1744Hard ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2025
hard
Arthur Rinderknech
FRA
Arthur Rinderknech
#28ATP
1780ELO
1748Hard ELO
$855kYTD
$7.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWW
Medjedovic H.
6-3 7-6
Rinderknech A.
Medjedovic H.
67112
Rinderknech A.
3690

Hamad Medjedovic defeated Arthur Rinderknech 6-3 7-6 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Rinderknech came in ranked #28, defending last year's round of 16. Hamad Medjedovic extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-16LondonR32grassHamad Medjedovic6.5-7.7 6.4-7.7
2025-10-01Shanghai MastersR128hardArthur Rinderknech6-7(3) 1-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Medjedovic H.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Rinderknech A.

Rinderknech A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Medjedovic H.Rinderknech A.
37
Serve
50
20
Return
1

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Medjedovic H.Rinderknech A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
69%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.0
10.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (67 vs 79). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Medjedovic H.Rinderknech A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
74
58
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Dominant
39
6
Deciding sets·Even
90
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Medjedovic H.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Rinderknech A.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.6Hard Elo 1744
Surface ELO
5.4+4 Hard Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1780
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
3.4
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
6.4
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Medjedovic H.Rinderknech A.
Freshness·Clear edge
95
83

Medjedovic H.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Rinderknech A.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.
Korda S.[11]
W/O
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[11]
Kecmanovic M.[13]
6-16-4
Fucsovics M.
Munar J.[12]
7-56-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Medjedovic H.
7-686-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Yunchaokete B.
6-35-76-3
R16
Yunchaokete B.
Navone M.
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-3
Munar J.[12]
Sonego L.[5]
4-66-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Muller A.[8]
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-1
Korda S.[11]
Majchrzak K.
6-736-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Diallo G.[4]
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Baez S.[10]
0-66-16-4
R32
Diallo G.[4]
Basavareddy N.
W/O
Fucsovics M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
6-34-66-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Oconnell C.
6-40-0
Van De Zandschulp B.
Arnaldi M.[6]
6-36-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Martinez P.
2-66-37-63
Yunchaokete B.
Tsitsipas S.[1]
6-36-2
Munar J.[12]
Bellucci M.
6-36-1
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-65
Majchrzak K.
Borges N.[7]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Giron M.[16]
6-26-2
Baez S.[10]
Carreno Busta P.
7-56-2
Darderi L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
7-656-766-4
Sonego L.[5]
Dostanic S.
6-36-727-63
Korda S.[11]
Kopriva V.
6-36-4
Muller A.[8]
Blanch D.
6-736-37-5
Medjedovic H.
Fearnley J.[15]
6-47-62
R64
Blanch D.
Coric B.
6-47-65
Kovacevic A.
Misolic F.
7-627-68
Van De Zandschulp B.
Walton A.
2-67-56-3
Carreno Busta P.
Nishioka Y.
6-06-3
Navone M.
Suresh D.
6-36-3
Basavareddy N.
Collignon R.
6-27-62
Dostanic S.
Vukic A.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Holt B.
6-46-727-62
Fucsovics M.
Gaston H.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.
Jarry N.
7-666-4
Oconnell C.
Safiullin R.
6-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-69
Kopriva V.
Ofner S.
3-66-46-3
Yunchaokete B.
Tseng C.
6-726-37-64
Martinez P.
Goffin D.
6-36-3
Bellucci M.
Comesana F.
6-46-3