Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard vs Hamad Medjedovic — Winston-Salem Quarter-final

Winston-Salem · ATP · Quarter-final
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
FRA9
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
#83ATP
1738ELO
1672Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$3.5MCAREER
23 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2025
hard
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB
Hamad Medjedovic
#68ATP
1841ELO
1744Hard ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWW
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-6 6-2
Medjedovic H.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
71062
Medjedovic H.
6820

Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard defeated Hamad Medjedovic 7-6 6-2 in the Winston-Salem quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Hamad Medjedovic came in ranked #68, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard claimed a first win over Hamad Medjedovic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-14BarcelonaR32clayHamad Medjedovic7-5 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Mpetshi Perricard G.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Medjedovic H.serving96% hold

wins 77% of points on serve vs Mpetshi Perricard G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mpetshi Perricard G.Medjedovic H.
81
Serve
37
0
Return
20

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mpetshi Perricard G.Medjedovic H.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
27%
37%
Break points saved·Even
67%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
14.0
7.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mpetshi Perricard G.Medjedovic H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
65
74
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Dominant
1
39
Deciding sets·Slight edge
95
90
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mpetshi Perricard G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Medjedovic H.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1672
Surface ELO
5.9+72 Hard Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1738
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1841
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
7.4
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mpetshi Perricard G.Medjedovic H.
Freshness·Even
95
95

Mpetshi Perricard G.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Medjedovic H.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fucsovics M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Fucsovics M.
Korda S.[11]
W/O
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[11]
Kecmanovic M.[13]
6-16-4
Fucsovics M.
Munar J.[12]
7-56-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Medjedovic H.
7-686-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Yunchaokete B.
6-35-76-3
R16
Yunchaokete B.
Navone M.
6-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-3
Munar J.[12]
Sonego L.[5]
4-66-46-1
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Muller A.[8]
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-1
Korda S.[11]
Majchrzak K.
6-736-36-4
Medjedovic H.
Diallo G.[4]
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Baez S.[10]
0-66-16-4
R32
Diallo G.[4]
Basavareddy N.
W/O
Fucsovics M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
6-34-66-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Oconnell C.
6-40-0
Van De Zandschulp B.
Arnaldi M.[6]
6-36-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[9]
Martinez P.
2-66-37-63
Yunchaokete B.
Tsitsipas S.[1]
6-36-2
Munar J.[12]
Bellucci M.
6-36-1
Kecmanovic M.[13]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-65
Majchrzak K.
Borges N.[7]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Giron M.[16]
6-26-2
Baez S.[10]
Carreno Busta P.
7-56-2
Darderi L.[3]
Mcdonald M.
7-656-766-4
Sonego L.[5]
Dostanic S.
6-36-727-63
Korda S.[11]
Kopriva V.
6-36-4
Muller A.[8]
Blanch D.
6-736-37-5
Medjedovic H.
Fearnley J.[15]
6-47-62
R64
Blanch D.
Coric B.
6-47-65
Kovacevic A.
Misolic F.
7-627-68
Van De Zandschulp B.
Walton A.
2-67-56-3
Carreno Busta P.
Nishioka Y.
6-06-3
Navone M.
Suresh D.
6-36-3
Basavareddy N.
Collignon R.
6-27-62
Dostanic S.
Vukic A.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Holt B.
6-46-727-62
Fucsovics M.
Gaston H.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.
Jarry N.
7-666-4
Oconnell C.
Safiullin R.
6-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-69
Kopriva V.
Ofner S.
3-66-46-3
Yunchaokete B.
Tseng C.
6-726-37-64
Martinez P.
Goffin D.
6-36-3
Bellucci M.
Comesana F.
6-46-3