Xin Yu Wang vs Suzan Lamens — Cleveland Round of 32

Cleveland · WTA · Round of 32
CHN2
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1716Hard ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2025
hard
Suzan Lamens
NED
Suzan Lamens
#129WTA
1622ELO
1573Hard ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
Wang X.
6-2 6-7 6-2
Lamens S.
Wang X.
66362
Lamens S.
27721

Xin Yu Wang defeated Suzan Lamens 6-2 6-7 6-2 in the Cleveland round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Xin Yu Wang came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Xin Yu Wang closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Lamens S.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Serve advantage — Wang X.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wang X.Lamens S.
25
Serve
0
40
Return
52

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Lamens S.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
54%
Return points won·Even
42%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Lamens S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
60
43
Break points saved·Dominant
86
51
Break points won·Clear edge
78
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Lamens S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+143 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1573
7.0Overall Elo 1760
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1622
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
9.3
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wang X.Lamens S.
Freshness·
—
100

Lamens S.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Cirstea S.
Li A.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Li A.
Wang X.[2]
6-35-76-4
Cirstea S.
Zakharova A.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Zakharova A.
Lys E.
W/O
Cirstea S.
Samsonova L.[1]
6-46-1
Wang X.[2]
Golubic V.
4-66-46-4
Li A.
Jacquemot E.
6-15-76-1
R16
Lys E.
Kudermetova P.
6-46-3
Golubic V.
Boulter K.[7]
7-661-66-4
Wang X.[2]
Gibson T.
1-66-26-3
Zakharova A.
Baptiste H.[8]
6-46-3
Cirstea S.
Teichmann J.
6-16-1
Samsonova L.[1]
Wang Y.
6-26-4
Jacquemot E.
Sierra S.
7-57-62
Li A.
Jovic I.
6-32-66-3
R32
Samsonova L.[1]
Dolehide C.
6-47-62
Jacquemot E.
Zhu L.
6-36-1
Sierra S.
Kartal S.[6]
4-66-47-62
Baptiste H.[8]
Ruse E.
6-27-62
Gibson T.
Minnen G.
7-626-4
Jovic I.
Potapova A.[4]
7-56-3
Kudermetova P.
Scott K.
6-46-4
Boulter K.[7]
Yuan Y.
6-46-3
Wang X.[2]
Lamens S.
6-26-736-2
Li A.
Starodubtseva Y.
7-56-3
Cirstea S.
Uchijima M.
6-46-1
Teichmann J.
Boisson L.[5]
6-41-66-4
Lys E.
Joint M.[3]
6-46-4
Golubic V.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-3
Wang Y.
Stearns P.
6-43-66-3
Zakharova A.
Birrell K.
5-76-46-3