Jaime Faria vs Mark Lajal — Sumter CH Quarter-final

Sumter CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
POR9
Jaime Faria
#98ATP
1735ELO
1615Hard ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Tuesday, 12 August 2025
hard
EST
Mark Lajal
#164ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Faria J.
5-7 6-4 7-6
Lajal M.
Faria J.
567102
Lajal M.
74681

Jaime Faria defeated Mark Lajal 5-7 6-4 7-6 in the Sumter CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jaime Faria came in ranked #98, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jaime Faria extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-01-13Australian OpenQ3hardJaime Faria6-4 2-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Faria J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Lajal M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Faria J.Lajal M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
63%
Aces / match·Even
6.4
5.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Faria J.Lajal M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
54
43
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
89
Break points won·Slight edge
22
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
42
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
76
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Faria J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Lajal M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+59 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1556
6.2Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1589
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.2
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Faria J.Lajal M.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
81

Faria J.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Lajal M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bellucci M.[3]
Shevchenko A.[5]
7-653-1
Semi-finals
Shevchenko A.[5]
Mochizuki S.[7]
4-66-16-1
Bellucci M.[3]
Faria J.[9]
6-06-4
Quarter-finals
Shevchenko A.[5]
Basilashvili N.[6]
3-67-634-1
Faria J.[9]
Lajal M.
5-76-47-68
Bellucci M.[3]
Klein L.[8]
6-46-2
Mochizuki S.[7]
Misolic F.[4]
6-44-66-4
R16
Faria J.[9]
Bigun K.
3-66-04-1
Shevchenko A.[5]
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-3
Misolic F.[4]
Trotter J.
6-37-61
Basilashvili N.[6]
Cassone M.
2-66-36-1
Bellucci M.[3]
Rocha H.
7-656-4
Lajal M.
Bergs Z.[1]
6-46-3
Mochizuki S.[7]
Poling K.
6-36-0
Klein L.[8]
Mccabe J.
7-56-1
R32
Klein L.[8]
Seggerman R.
6-40-0
Mccabe J.
Fearnley J.
3-67-50-0
Bigun K.
Sakamoto R.
6-36-1
Faria J.[9]
Habib H.
6-796-17-5
Mochizuki S.[7]
Rybakov A.
7-57-62
Trotter J.
Landaluce M.
6-46-3
Cassone M.
Blanch D.
7-53-66-3
Shimabukuro S.
Nishioka Y.
6-37-5
Poling K.
Evans D.
1-66-46-4
Rocha H.
Damm M.
3-66-36-4
Basilashvili N.[6]
Eubanks C.
6-33-67-5
Lajal M.
Kirchheimer S.
1-66-37-5