Aoi Ito vs Aleksandra Krunic — Cincinnati Qualifying Round 1

Cincinnati · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
JPN
Aoi Ito
#228WTA
1549ELO
1568Hard ELO
22 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 7 August 2025
hard
SRB
Aleksandra Krunic
#936WTA
33 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWW
Ito A.
4-6 6-4 6-2
Krunic A.
Ito A.
4662
Krunic A.
6421

Aoi Ito defeated Aleksandra Krunic 4-6 6-4 6-2 in the Cincinnati qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito A.serving50% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Krunic A.

Krunic A.serving46% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Ito A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito A.Krunic A.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
43%
Service points won·Even
54%
53%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
51%
50%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ito A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Krunic A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 24 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.8
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ito A.Krunic A.
Freshness·
96
—

Ito A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Ruzic A.
Hozumi E.
6-36-1
Osuigwe W.
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Siegemund L.
Guo H.
6-26-756-3
Rakhimova K.
Marino R.
3-66-47-5
Bektas E.
Sierra S.
6-37-5
Seidel E.
Hon P.
5-76-36-4
Gracheva V.
Jovic I.
6-36-4
Ngounoue C.
Yuan Y.
3-66-46-3
Jeanjean L.
Masarova R.
6-36-4
Tomova V.
Jacquemot E.
6-46-1
Inglis M.
Zakharova A.
4-66-26-2
Ito A.
Galfi D.
6-36-4
Q1
Siegemund L.
Aiava D.
6-16-1
Guo H.
Todoni A.
6-16-0
Rakhimova K.
Burrage J.
7-686-2
Marino R.
Mandlik E.
6-27-62
Sierra S.
Trevisan M.
6-36-4
Bektas E.
Kawa K.
6-16-1
Hon P.
Cocciaretto E.
6-46-4
Seidel E.
Lepchenko V.
6-26-1
Jovic I.
Eikeri U.
7-56-2
Gracheva V.
Buzarnescu M.
6-06-2
Yuan Y.
Sharma A.
6-46-2
Ngounoue C.
Gadecki O.
6-726-36-3
Ruzic A.
Arconada U.
6-26-4
Hozumi E.
Shibahara E.
6-44-66-2
Bucsa C.
Mateas M.
6-16-1
Osuigwe W.
Sasnovich A.
7-646-4
Jeanjean L.
Zhao C.
6-14-66-3
Masarova R.
Davis L.
6-26-4
Jacquemot E.
Juvan K.
2-67-57-5
Tomova V.
Chirico L.
6-26-1
Inglis M.
Parrizas Diaz N.
1-67-656-2
Zakharova A.
Watson H.
6-26-3
Galfi D.
Hibino N.
2-66-36-3
Ito A.
Krunic A.
4-66-46-2