Maddison Inglis vs Nuria Parrizas Diaz — Cincinnati Qualifying Round 1

Cincinnati · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Maddison Inglis
AUS
Maddison Inglis
#149WTA
1590ELO
1558Hard ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 7 August 2025
hard
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
ESP
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
#577WTA
1398ELO
1400Hard ELO
34 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Inglis M.
1-6 7-6 6-2
Parrizas Diaz N.
Inglis M.
17762
Parrizas Diaz N.
66521

Maddison Inglis defeated Nuria Parrizas Diaz 1-6 7-6 6-2 in the Cincinnati qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Maddison Inglis came in ranked #149. Maddison Inglis claimed a first win over Nuria Parrizas Diaz in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-01-02United CupRRhardNuria Parrizas Diaz6-1 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Inglis M.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Parrizas Diaz N.

Parrizas Diaz N.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Inglis M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Inglis M.Parrizas Diaz N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
55%
Return points won·Even
42%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
50%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (67 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Inglis M.Parrizas Diaz N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
22
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
50
36
Break points won·Dominant
25
79
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Inglis M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 38 days (−0.7)
Parrizas Diaz N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+159 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1400
7.1Overall Elo 1590
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1398
5.4
H2H
4.6
5.5
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Inglis M.Parrizas Diaz N.
Freshness·
100
—

Inglis M.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Ruzic A.
Hozumi E.
6-36-1
Osuigwe W.
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Siegemund L.
Guo H.
6-26-756-3
Rakhimova K.
Marino R.
3-66-47-5
Bektas E.
Sierra S.
6-37-5
Seidel E.
Hon P.
5-76-36-4
Gracheva V.
Jovic I.
6-36-4
Ngounoue C.
Yuan Y.
3-66-46-3
Jeanjean L.
Masarova R.
6-36-4
Tomova V.
Jacquemot E.
6-46-1
Inglis M.
Zakharova A.
4-66-26-2
Ito A.
Galfi D.
6-36-4
Q1
Siegemund L.
Aiava D.
6-16-1
Guo H.
Todoni A.
6-16-0
Rakhimova K.
Burrage J.
7-686-2
Marino R.
Mandlik E.
6-27-62
Sierra S.
Trevisan M.
6-36-4
Bektas E.
Kawa K.
6-16-1
Hon P.
Cocciaretto E.
6-46-4
Seidel E.
Lepchenko V.
6-26-1
Jovic I.
Eikeri U.
7-56-2
Gracheva V.
Buzarnescu M.
6-06-2
Yuan Y.
Sharma A.
6-46-2
Ngounoue C.
Gadecki O.
6-726-36-3
Ruzic A.
Arconada U.
6-26-4
Hozumi E.
Shibahara E.
6-44-66-2
Bucsa C.
Mateas M.
6-16-1
Osuigwe W.
Sasnovich A.
7-646-4
Jeanjean L.
Zhao C.
6-14-66-3
Masarova R.
Davis L.
6-26-4
Jacquemot E.
Juvan K.
2-67-57-5
Tomova V.
Chirico L.
6-26-1
Inglis M.
Parrizas Diaz N.
1-67-656-2
Zakharova A.
Watson H.
6-26-3
Galfi D.
Hibino N.
2-66-36-3
Ito A.
Krunic A.
4-66-46-2