Terence Atmane vs Li Tu — Cincinnati Masters Qualifying Round 2

Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Terence Atmane
FRA23
Terence Atmane
#52ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Thursday, 7 August 2025
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#421ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Atmane T.
7-5 6-3
Tu L.
Atmane T.
762
Tu L.
530

Terence Atmane defeated Li Tu 7-5 6-3 in the Cincinnati Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #52.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Tu L.
36
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
7.7
8.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
82
Break points won·Clear edge
25
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Tu L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+202 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1471
7.7Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1488
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.2
Surface form
2.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
8.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Tu L.
Freshness·
94
—

Atmane T.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
28°CClear
Wind 5 km/hHumidity 67%
Q2
Nava E.[15]
Navone M.[2]
7-56-4
Atmane T.[23]
Tu L.
7-56-3
Blockx A.[18]
Nardi L.[6]
6-46-3
Galan D.[24]
Shevchenko A.[8]
7-664-1
Wong C.
Mochizuki S.[19]
7-656-3
Riedi L.
Harris L.
7-676-3
Smith C.
Basilashvili N.[13]
7-56-1
Kypson P.
Vukic A.[7]
7-637-64
Landaluce M.
Fery A.
6-26-756-2
Tirante T.[22]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-676-3
Royer V.[12]
Draxl L.[14]
2-66-36-4
Mannarino A.[5]
Svrcina D.[17]
6-36-4
Q1
Shevchenko A.[8]
Zink T.
7-626-786-3
Fery A.
Svajda Z.
7-634-67-64
Svrcina D.[17]
Watanuki Y.
6-26-0
Navone M.[2]
Struff J.
6-726-26-4
Tirante T.[22]
Trotter J.
6-23-66-3
Smith C.
Schoolkate T.[9]
6-46-4
Vukic A.[7]
Cassone M.
7-56-737-64
Mannarino A.[5]
Krueger M.
6-16-1
Draxl L.[14]
Martin A.
6-37-63
Blockx A.[18]
Kachmazov A.
4-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Lajal M.
4-66-16-2
Royer V.[12]
Ficovich J.
6-16-2
Wong C.
Cerundolo J.[3]
6-26-3
Basilashvili N.[13]
Eubanks C.
6-44-67-62
Nardi L.[6]
Mayo A.
6-36-2
Harris L.
Spizzirri E.[20]
7-654-67-62
Tu L.
Duckworth J.[10]
7-646-4
Mochizuki S.[19]
Bagnis F.
3-66-36-4
Nava E.[15]
Kukushkin M.
7-56-2
Galan D.[24]
Daniel T.
7-56-2
Atmane T.[23]
Jasika O.
7-56-4
Kypson P.
Gigante M.[21]
6-36-2
Landaluce M.
Garin C.[16]
6-43-67-65
Riedi L.
Carreno Busta P.[4]
7-636-4