Yibing Wu vs Naoki Nakagawa — Chicago CH Round of 16

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Yibing Wu
CHN4
Yibing Wu
#106ATP
1743ELO
1741Hard ELO
$472kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 August 2025
hard
JPN
Naoki Nakagawa
#776ATP
1289ELO
1271Hard ELO
29 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWLL
Wu Y.
6-3 6-2
Nakagawa N.
Wu Y.
662
Nakagawa N.
320

Yibing Wu defeated Naoki Nakagawa 6-3 6-2 in the Chicago CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Yibing Wu came in ranked #106.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu Y.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Nakagawa N.

Nakagawa N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wu Y.

Serve advantage — Wu Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wu Y.Nakagawa N.
27
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wu Y.Nakagawa N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
6.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (62 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu Y.Nakagawa N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
3
Break points saved·Dominant
94
57
Break points won·Dominant
57
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu Y.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Nakagawa N.
2.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
10.0+470 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1271
10.0Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1289
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
2.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
8.2
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu Y.Nakagawa N.
Freshness·
71
—

Wu Y.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 50 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Hsu Y.[7]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Johns G.
2-66-46-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Holmgren A.[1]
7-623-67-63
Quarter-finals
Holmgren A.[1]
Hussey G.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[7]
Wu Y.[4]
7-646-4
Zheng M.
Habib H.[3]
6-46-3
Johns G.
Svajda T.
7-56-2
R16
Wu Y.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.[7]
Sell K.
6-36-2
Zheng M.
Zhou Y.
6-43-67-65
Habib H.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-56-4
Svajda T.
Zhukayev B.[5]
6-36-0
Holmgren A.[1]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Johns G.
Bolt A.
6-22-67-5
Hussey G.
Dostanic S.
4-67-54-2
R32
Dostanic S.
Tomic B.[6]
6-737-642-0
Sell K.
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Holmgren A.[1]
King D.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Vallejo A.
6-06-2
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
7-676-2
Banerjee S.
Rybakov A.
6-26-3
Svajda T.
Jung J.
6-37-67
Johns G.
Harris B.[2]
3-66-36-4
Zhou Y.
Sheehy J.
6-36-2
Wu Y.[4]
Ilagan A.
1-66-26-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Fenty A.
6-26-2
Habib H.[3]
Kang K.
7-676-3
Zhukayev B.[5]
Maloney P.
4-66-36-4
Bolt A.
Huang T.
6-17-67
Nakagawa N.
Perez A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.
Damm M.
7-627-5