Yibing Wu vs Andre Ilagan — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Yibing Wu
CHN4
Yibing Wu
#106ATP
1743ELO
1741Hard ELO
$472kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 August 2025
hard
USA
Andre Ilagan
#253ATP
1543ELO
1518Hard ELO
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWW
Wu Y.
1-6 6-2 6-1
Ilagan A.
Wu Y.
1662
Ilagan A.
6211

Yibing Wu defeated Andre Ilagan 1-6 6-2 6-1 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Yibing Wu came in ranked #106.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu Y.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilagan A.

Ilagan A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wu Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wu Y.Ilagan A.
27
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wu Y.Ilagan A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (62 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu Y.Ilagan A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
76
Break points won·Dominant
57
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu Y.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Ilagan A.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.5+222 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.5Hard Elo 1518
9.6Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
0.4Overall Elo 1543
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
6.0
0.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu Y.Ilagan A.
Freshness·Even
71
68

Wu Y.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 50 games (7d) · Ilagan A.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 80 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Hsu Y.[7]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Johns G.
2-66-46-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Holmgren A.[1]
7-623-67-63
Quarter-finals
Holmgren A.[1]
Hussey G.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[7]
Wu Y.[4]
7-646-4
Zheng M.
Habib H.[3]
6-46-3
Johns G.
Svajda T.
7-56-2
R16
Wu Y.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.[7]
Sell K.
6-36-2
Zheng M.
Zhou Y.
6-43-67-65
Habib H.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-56-4
Svajda T.
Zhukayev B.[5]
6-36-0
Holmgren A.[1]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Johns G.
Bolt A.
6-22-67-5
Hussey G.
Dostanic S.
4-67-54-2
R32
Dostanic S.
Tomic B.[6]
6-737-642-0
Sell K.
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Holmgren A.[1]
King D.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Vallejo A.
6-06-2
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
7-676-2
Banerjee S.
Rybakov A.
6-26-3
Svajda T.
Jung J.
6-37-67
Johns G.
Harris B.[2]
3-66-36-4
Zhou Y.
Sheehy J.
6-36-2
Wu Y.[4]
Ilagan A.
1-66-26-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Fenty A.
6-26-2
Habib H.[3]
Kang K.
7-676-3
Zhukayev B.[5]
Maloney P.
4-66-36-4
Bolt A.
Huang T.
6-17-67
Nakagawa N.
Perez A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.
Damm M.
7-627-5