Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Yibing Wu — Chicago CH Quarter-final

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE7
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#206ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 August 2025
hard
Yibing Wu
CHN4
Yibing Wu
#102ATP
1743ELO
1741Hard ELO
$472kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWLW
Hsu Y.
7-6 6-4
Wu Y.
Hsu Y.
7762
Wu Y.
6440

Yu Hsiou Hsu defeated Yibing Wu 7-6 6-4 in the Chicago CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yibing Wu came in ranked #102.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hsu Y.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wu Y.

Wu Y.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Serve advantage — Wu Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Hsu Y.Wu Y.
—
Serve
27
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Hsu Y.Wu Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hsu Y.Wu Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
82
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
94
Break points won·Dominant
4
57
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
97
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hsu Y.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Wu Y.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.4Hard Elo 1468
Surface ELO
8.6+272 Hard Elo edge
1.4Overall Elo 1489
ELO gap
8.6Overall Elo 1743
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.1
Surface form
7.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.4
Minutes 14d
3.7
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hsu Y.Wu Y.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
80

Hsu Y.: 20 days rest · Wu Y.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Hsu Y.[7]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Johns G.
2-66-46-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Holmgren A.[1]
7-623-67-63
Quarter-finals
Holmgren A.[1]
Hussey G.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[7]
Wu Y.[4]
7-646-4
Zheng M.
Habib H.[3]
6-46-3
Johns G.
Svajda T.
7-56-2
R16
Wu Y.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.[7]
Sell K.
6-36-2
Zheng M.
Zhou Y.
6-43-67-65
Habib H.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-56-4
Svajda T.
Zhukayev B.[5]
6-36-0
Holmgren A.[1]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Johns G.
Bolt A.
6-22-67-5
Hussey G.
Dostanic S.
4-67-54-2
R32
Dostanic S.
Tomic B.[6]
6-737-642-0
Sell K.
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Holmgren A.[1]
King D.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Vallejo A.
6-06-2
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
7-676-2
Banerjee S.
Rybakov A.
6-26-3
Svajda T.
Jung J.
6-37-67
Johns G.
Harris B.[2]
3-66-36-4
Zhou Y.
Sheehy J.
6-36-2
Wu Y.[4]
Ilagan A.
1-66-26-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Fenty A.
6-26-2
Habib H.[3]
Kang K.
7-676-3
Zhukayev B.[5]
Maloney P.
4-66-36-4
Bolt A.
Huang T.
6-17-67
Nakagawa N.
Perez A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.
Damm M.
7-627-5