Yu Hsiou Hsu vs August Holmgren — Chicago CH Semi-final

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE7
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#206ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 August 2025
hard
DEN1
August Holmgren
#143ATP
1566ELO
1517Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$646kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Hsu Y.
7-6 3-6 7-6
Holmgren A.
Hsu Y.
773772
Holmgren A.
626631

Yu Hsiou Hsu defeated August Holmgren 7-6 3-6 7-6 in the Chicago CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — August Holmgren came in ranked #143.

Key context

  • Match story: Yu Hsiou Hsu closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hsu Y.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holmgren A.

Holmgren A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hsu Y.Holmgren A.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
8.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hsu Y.Holmgren A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
36
43
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
90
Break points won·Even
4
0
Deciding sets·Even
50
46
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hsu Y.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Holmgren A.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1468
Surface ELO
5.2+48 Hard Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1489
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1566
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.4
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hsu Y.Holmgren A.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
83

Hsu Y.: 19 days rest · Holmgren A.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Hsu Y.[7]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Johns G.
2-66-46-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Holmgren A.[1]
7-623-67-63
Quarter-finals
Holmgren A.[1]
Hussey G.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[7]
Wu Y.[4]
7-646-4
Zheng M.
Habib H.[3]
6-46-3
Johns G.
Svajda T.
7-56-2
R16
Wu Y.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.[7]
Sell K.
6-36-2
Zheng M.
Zhou Y.
6-43-67-65
Habib H.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-56-4
Svajda T.
Zhukayev B.[5]
6-36-0
Holmgren A.[1]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Johns G.
Bolt A.
6-22-67-5
Hussey G.
Dostanic S.
4-67-54-2
R32
Dostanic S.
Tomic B.[6]
6-737-642-0
Sell K.
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Holmgren A.[1]
King D.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Vallejo A.
6-06-2
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
7-676-2
Banerjee S.
Rybakov A.
6-26-3
Svajda T.
Jung J.
6-37-67
Johns G.
Harris B.[2]
3-66-36-4
Zhou Y.
Sheehy J.
6-36-2
Wu Y.[4]
Ilagan A.
1-66-26-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Fenty A.
6-26-2
Habib H.[3]
Kang K.
7-676-3
Zhukayev B.[5]
Maloney P.
4-66-36-4
Bolt A.
Huang T.
6-17-67
Nakagawa N.
Perez A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.
Damm M.
7-627-5