Emma Kamper vs Madelief Hageman — W15 Hameenlinna Quarter-final

W15 Hameenlinna · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
DEN
Emma Kamper
#889WTA
22 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 August 2025
clay
NED
Madelief Hageman
#809WTA
23 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLLW
Kamper E.
7-5 5-7 6-3
Hageman M.
Kamper E.
7562
Hageman M.
5731

Emma Kamper defeated Madelief Hageman 7-5 5-7 6-3 in the W15 Hameenlinna quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Emma Kamper closed it out in three sets, 7–5 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kamper E.serving36% hold

wins 44% of points on serve vs Hageman M.

Hageman M.serving26% hold

wins 40% of points on serve vs Kamper E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kamper E.Hageman M.
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
57%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
41%
45%
Service points won·Even
52%
54%
Return points won·Slight edge
53%
46%
Break points saved·Even
50%
51%
Aces / match·Even
0.8
1.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (13 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kamper E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hageman M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Hietaranta L.
Haavisto E.
6-16-0
Semi-finals
Hietaranta L.
Kamper E.
6-26-4
Haavisto E.
Yesypchuk D.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Kamper E.
Hageman M.
7-55-76-3
Haavisto E.
Chramcova V.
6-31-0
Hietaranta L.
Chlpac A.
6-12-0
Yesypchuk D.
Herrmann S.
6-24-66-1
R16
Hageman M.
Ghirardato E.
6-26-3
Yesypchuk D.
Skoog I.
6-46-736-1
Herrmann S.
Leon I.
6-17-5
Kamper E.
Schaedel L.
7-56-1
Haavisto E.
Silva J.
6-36-4
Hietaranta L.
Ceuca A.
7-56-0
Chramcova V.
Havermans D.
6-26-777-64
Chlpac A.
Johansson I.
6-16-1
R32
Ceuca A.
Eto N.
6-16-0
Leon I.
Grekul E.
6-26-2
Chlpac A.
Odorizzi C.
6-36-0
Schaedel L.
Brune Olsen A.
6-16-4
Herrmann S.
Sushkova A.
6-36-2
Havermans D.
Ahti V.
6-46-2
Skoog I.
Svahn I.
6-36-3
Silva J.
Koskel A.
6-35-76-3
Ghirardato E.
Paterno G.
6-06-3
Chramcova V.
Blomqvist C.
6-34-66-2
Kamper E.
Kotamaeki M.
6-06-3
Hageman M.
De Koning R.
6-46-1
Johansson I.
Vanni H.
6-36-2
Yesypchuk D.
Remander S.
6-26-0
Haavisto E.
Svendsen J.
6-46-2
Hietaranta L.
Syrtveit C.
6-16-3