Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Andrew Fenty — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE7
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 August 2025
hard
USA
Andrew Fenty
#399ATP
1199ELO
1183Hard ELO
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWL
Hsu Y.
6-2 6-2
Fenty A.
Hsu Y.
662
Fenty A.
220

Yu Hsiou Hsu defeated Andrew Fenty 6-2 6-2 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hsu Y.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fenty A.

Fenty A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hsu Y.Fenty A.
1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hsu Y.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Fenty A.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.4+286 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.6Hard Elo 1183
8.6Overall Elo 1489
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1199
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
1.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 9
Fatigue & Travel
2.4
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hsu Y.Fenty A.
Freshness·Even
100
98

Hsu Y.: 21 days rest · Fenty A.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Hsu Y.[7]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Johns G.
2-66-46-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Holmgren A.[1]
7-623-67-63
Quarter-finals
Holmgren A.[1]
Hussey G.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[7]
Wu Y.[4]
7-646-4
Zheng M.
Habib H.[3]
6-46-3
Johns G.
Svajda T.
7-56-2
R16
Wu Y.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.[7]
Sell K.
6-36-2
Zheng M.
Zhou Y.
6-43-67-65
Habib H.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-56-4
Svajda T.
Zhukayev B.[5]
6-36-0
Holmgren A.[1]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Johns G.
Bolt A.
6-22-67-5
Hussey G.
Dostanic S.
4-67-54-2
R32
Dostanic S.
Tomic B.[6]
6-737-642-0
Sell K.
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Holmgren A.[1]
King D.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Vallejo A.
6-06-2
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
7-676-2
Banerjee S.
Rybakov A.
6-26-3
Svajda T.
Jung J.
6-37-67
Johns G.
Harris B.[2]
3-66-36-4
Zhou Y.
Sheehy J.
6-36-2
Wu Y.[4]
Ilagan A.
1-66-26-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Fenty A.
6-26-2
Habib H.[3]
Kang K.
7-676-3
Zhukayev B.[5]
Maloney P.
4-66-36-4
Bolt A.
Huang T.
6-17-67
Nakagawa N.
Perez A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.
Damm M.
7-627-5