Federico Cina vs Kyrian Jacquet — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Round of 32

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Federico Cina
#184ATP
1630ELO
1583Hard ELO
$293kYTD
$533kCAREER
19 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 August 2025
hard
Kyrian Jacquet
FRA4
Kyrian Jacquet
#130ATP
1685ELO
1663Hard ELO
$264kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Cina F.
6-2 6-1
Jacquet K.
Cina F.
662
Jacquet K.
210

Federico Cina defeated Kyrian Jacquet 6-2 6-1 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kyrian Jacquet came in ranked #130.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cina F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jacquet K.

Jacquet K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cina F.

Serve advantage — Jacquet K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cina F.Jacquet K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (70 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cina F.Jacquet K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
47
Break points saved·Even
87
87
Break points won·Slight edge
32
27
Deciding sets·Clear edge
52
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
28
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cina F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Jacquet K.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1583
Surface ELO
6.6+80 Hard Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1630
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1685
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
5.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cina F.Jacquet K.
Freshness·Clear edge
69
93

Cina F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d) · Jacquet K.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Majchrzak K.[1]
Prizmic D.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.[2]
Mayot H.[3]
6-46-3
Majchrzak K.[1]
Blanchet U.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[1]
Glinka D.
6-43-66-4
Blanchet U.
Cina F.
7-56-4
Mayot H.[3]
Zeppieri G.
6-36-2
Prizmic D.[2]
Maestrelli F.[6]
6-36-4
R16
Cina F.
Karatsev A.
6-06-3
Blanchet U.
Huesler M.[5]
6-36-3
Zeppieri G.
Brunclik P.
7-666-756-2
Mayot H.[3]
Cui J.
6-46-4
Maestrelli F.[6]
Engel J.
6-47-62
Prizmic D.[2]
Pieczkowski O.
6-46-2
Majchrzak K.[1]
Berkieta T.
6-36-2
Glinka D.
Kasnikowski M.
7-676-4
R32
Berkieta T.
Soto M.
7-657-65
Majchrzak K.[1]
Ivashka I.
3-66-07-5
Kasnikowski M.
Grenier H.[8]
4-67-656-1
Cina F.
Jacquet K.[4]
6-26-1
Karatsev A.
Pieczonka F.
6-746-27-5
Zeppieri G.
Monday J.
6-36-4
Cui J.
Binda A.
7-666-3
Pieczkowski O.
Durasovic V.
6-36-4
Prizmic D.[2]
Onclin G.
6-26-4
Engel J.
Moro Canas A.
6-756-46-4
Brunclik P.
Hemery C.[7]
6-26-3
Huesler M.[5]
Jodar R.
7-616-4
Maestrelli F.[6]
Jones M.
6-46-4
Mayot H.[3]
Chidekh C.
6-47-64
Blanchet U.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-1
Glinka D.
Albot R.
6-36-4