Garrett Johns vs Alex Bolt — Chicago CH Round of 16

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Garrett Johns
USA
Garrett Johns
#382ATP
1336ELO
1323Hard ELO
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 August 2025
hard
Alex Bolt
AUS
Alex Bolt
#152ATP
1588ELO
1541Hard ELO
$125kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Johns G.
6-2 2-6 7-5
Bolt A.
Johns G.
6272
Bolt A.
2651

Garrett Johns defeated Alex Bolt 6-2 2-6 7-5 in the Chicago CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alex Bolt came in ranked #152, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Garrett Johns claimed a first win over Alex Bolt in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Garrett Johns closed it out in three sets, 6–2 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-23AtlantaQ1hardAlex Bolt6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Johns G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bolt A.

Bolt A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Johns G.

Serve advantage — Bolt A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Johns G.Bolt A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.5
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Johns G.Bolt A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
36
44
Break points saved·Dominant
66
93
Break points won·Even
3
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Johns G.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Bolt A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.1Hard Elo 1323
Surface ELO
7.9+217 Hard Elo edge
1.6Overall Elo 1336
ELO gap
8.4Overall Elo 1588
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Johns G.Bolt A.
Freshness·Dominant
63
100

Johns G.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 95 games (7d) · Bolt A.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zheng M.
Hsu Y.[7]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Zheng M.
Johns G.
2-66-46-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Holmgren A.[1]
7-623-67-63
Quarter-finals
Holmgren A.[1]
Hussey G.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[7]
Wu Y.[4]
7-646-4
Zheng M.
Habib H.[3]
6-46-3
Johns G.
Svajda T.
7-56-2
R16
Wu Y.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.[7]
Sell K.
6-36-2
Zheng M.
Zhou Y.
6-43-67-65
Habib H.[3]
Banerjee S.
7-56-4
Svajda T.
Zhukayev B.[5]
6-36-0
Holmgren A.[1]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-4
Johns G.
Bolt A.
6-22-67-5
Hussey G.
Dostanic S.
4-67-54-2
R32
Dostanic S.
Tomic B.[6]
6-737-642-0
Sell K.
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Holmgren A.[1]
King D.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Vallejo A.
6-06-2
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
7-676-2
Banerjee S.
Rybakov A.
6-26-3
Svajda T.
Jung J.
6-37-67
Johns G.
Harris B.[2]
3-66-36-4
Zhou Y.
Sheehy J.
6-36-2
Wu Y.[4]
Ilagan A.
1-66-26-1
Hsu Y.[7]
Fenty A.
6-26-2
Habib H.[3]
Kang K.
7-676-3
Zhukayev B.[5]
Maloney P.
4-66-36-4
Bolt A.
Huang T.
6-17-67
Nakagawa N.
Perez A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.
Damm M.
7-627-5