Bernard Tomic vs Nicolas Mejia — Lexington CH Round of 16

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
hard
Nicolas Mejia
COL
Nicolas Mejia
#165ATP
1477ELO
1424Hard ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLWWWWLW
Tomic B.
7-6 6-3
Mejia N.
Tomic B.
7762
Mejia N.
6430

Bernard Tomic defeated Nicolas Mejia 7-6 6-3 in the Lexington CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Mejia came in ranked #165, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Bernard Tomic claimed a first win over Nicolas Mejia in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-23AcapulcoQ1hardNicolas Mejia6-3 3-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Mejia N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Mejia N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Mejia N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
74
Break points won·Even
4
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Mejia N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+18 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Hard Elo 1424
4.7Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1477
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.9
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
6.3
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Mejia N.
Freshness·Clear edge
75
56

Tomic B.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Mejia N.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[6]
Tomic B.
2-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Tomic B.
Spizzirri E.[2]
6-32-67-63
Svajda Z.[6]
Hsu Y.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tomic B.
Hussey G.
7-656-3
Spizzirri E.[2]
Suresh D.
7-646-4
Svajda Z.[6]
Basavareddy N.[1]
1-67-56-4
Hsu Y.
Zheng M.
6-17-5
R16
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
7-646-3
Suresh D.
Lajal M.
6-746-46-4
Hussey G.
Habib H.[8]
7-676-3
Zheng M.
Evans D.[3]
6-16-3
Hsu Y.
Eubanks C.[7]
6-46-4
Svajda Z.[6]
Matsuda R.
6-16-0
Basavareddy N.[1]
Kachmazov A.
7-56-0
Spizzirri E.[2]
Sakamoto R.
7-656-774-3
R32
Mejia N.
Holmgren A.[4]
6-757-55-1
Matsuda R.
Jasika O.
6-727-51-0
Basavareddy N.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-3
Svajda Z.[6]
Rybakov A.
6-27-610
Zheng M.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Mayo A.
7-643-66-3
Hussey G.
Bolt A.
6-43-66-3
Suresh D.
Harris B.[5]
6-37-5
Sakamoto R.
Ghibaudo A.
1-66-46-2
Evans D.[3]
Andrade A.
6-36-3
Habib H.[8]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
Tomic B.
Banerjee S.
6-46-4
Spizzirri E.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Cassone M.
6-26-3
Kachmazov A.
Zhukayev B.
7-636-727-61
Lajal M.
Harris L.
7-54-2