Dmitry Popko vs Anton Matusevich — Hagen CH Round of 32

Hagen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Dmitry Popko
KAZ
Dmitry Popko
#629ATP
1385ELO
1334Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
clay
GBR
Anton Matusevich
#377ATP
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLLW
Popko D.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Matusevich A.
Popko D.
3662
Matusevich A.
6341

Dmitry Popko defeated Anton Matusevich 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Hagen CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Popko D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Matusevich A.

Matusevich A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Popko D.

Serve advantage — Matusevich A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Popko D.Matusevich A.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (56 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Popko D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Matusevich A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.4
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Popko D.Matusevich A.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
99

Popko D.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d) · Matusevich A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Den Ouden G.[6]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Kym J.[4]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Wallin O.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
7-624-66-3
Kym J.[4]
Mcdonald N.
3-66-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Choinski J.[5]
7-666-4
Wallin O.
Gaubas V.[2]
7-647-610
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Masur D.
6-46-1
Kym J.[4]
Cecchinato M.
6-16-4
Gaubas V.[2]
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Skatov T.
3-66-47-66
Wallin O.
Tabur C.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Popko D.
3-66-16-4
Den Ouden G.[6]
Negritu C.
7-656-746-3
Mcdonald N.
Nagal S.
6-24-66-4
R32
Mcdonald N.
Rodionov J.[9]
6-46-3
Masur D.
Engel J.
7-646-2
Negritu C.
Blanch D.
7-54-66-3
Den Ouden G.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Cecchinato M.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-3
Tabur C.
Hassan B.[8]
6-46-4
Wallin O.
Schoenhaus M.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[5]
Giustino L.
4-66-37-61
Kym J.[4]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Gaubas V.[2]
Midon L.
6-36-726-1
Schwaerzler J.
Kestelboim M.
6-33-67-63
Popko D.
Matusevich A.
3-66-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Mikrut L.
6-46-2
Skatov T.
Donski A.
6-16-3
Nagal S.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Friend J.
7-56-2