Alibek Kachmazov vs Beibit Zhukayev — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#779ATP
1490ELO
1467Hard ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
hard
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#316ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
Kachmazov A.
7-6 6-7 7-6
Zhukayev B.
Kachmazov A.
7762772
Zhukayev B.
6377611

Alibek Kachmazov defeated Beibit Zhukayev 7-6 6-7 7-6 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kachmazov A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kachmazov A.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
11.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (39 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kachmazov A.Zhukayev B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
94
Break points won·Clear edge
16
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
61
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
87
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kachmazov A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Zhukayev B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+65 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1402
5.4Overall Elo 1490
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1455
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
5.9
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[6]
Tomic B.
2-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Tomic B.
Spizzirri E.[2]
6-32-67-63
Svajda Z.[6]
Hsu Y.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tomic B.
Hussey G.
7-656-3
Spizzirri E.[2]
Suresh D.
7-646-4
Svajda Z.[6]
Basavareddy N.[1]
1-67-56-4
Hsu Y.
Zheng M.
6-17-5
R16
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
7-646-3
Suresh D.
Lajal M.
6-746-46-4
Hussey G.
Habib H.[8]
7-676-3
Zheng M.
Evans D.[3]
6-16-3
Hsu Y.
Eubanks C.[7]
6-46-4
Svajda Z.[6]
Matsuda R.
6-16-0
Basavareddy N.[1]
Kachmazov A.
7-56-0
Spizzirri E.[2]
Sakamoto R.
7-656-774-3
R32
Mejia N.
Holmgren A.[4]
6-757-55-1
Matsuda R.
Jasika O.
6-727-51-0
Basavareddy N.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-3
Svajda Z.[6]
Rybakov A.
6-27-610
Zheng M.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Mayo A.
7-643-66-3
Hussey G.
Bolt A.
6-43-66-3
Suresh D.
Harris B.[5]
6-37-5
Sakamoto R.
Ghibaudo A.
1-66-46-2
Evans D.[3]
Andrade A.
6-36-3
Habib H.[8]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
Tomic B.
Banerjee S.
6-46-4
Spizzirri E.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Cassone M.
6-26-3
Kachmazov A.
Zhukayev B.
7-636-727-61
Lajal M.
Harris L.
7-54-2