Bernard Tomic vs Giles Hussey — Lexington CH Quarter-final

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
hard
GBR
Giles Hussey
#258ATP
1584ELO
1517Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWW
Tomic B.
7-6 6-3
Hussey G.
Tomic B.
7762
Hussey G.
6530

Bernard Tomic defeated Giles Hussey 7-6 6-3 in the Lexington CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Bernard Tomic came in ranked #204, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hussey G.

Hussey G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Hussey G.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Hussey G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
45
Break points saved·Dominant
92
57
Break points won·Dominant
4
57
Deciding sets·Even
74
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Hussey G.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
6.5Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
3.5+76 Hard Elo edge
6.6Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1584
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
8.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Hussey G.
Freshness·Clear edge
75
98

Tomic B.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Hussey G.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[6]
Tomic B.
2-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Tomic B.
Spizzirri E.[2]
6-32-67-63
Svajda Z.[6]
Hsu Y.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tomic B.
Hussey G.
7-656-3
Spizzirri E.[2]
Suresh D.
7-646-4
Svajda Z.[6]
Basavareddy N.[1]
1-67-56-4
Hsu Y.
Zheng M.
6-17-5
R16
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
7-646-3
Suresh D.
Lajal M.
6-746-46-4
Hussey G.
Habib H.[8]
7-676-3
Zheng M.
Evans D.[3]
6-16-3
Hsu Y.
Eubanks C.[7]
6-46-4
Svajda Z.[6]
Matsuda R.
6-16-0
Basavareddy N.[1]
Kachmazov A.
7-56-0
Spizzirri E.[2]
Sakamoto R.
7-656-774-3
R32
Mejia N.
Holmgren A.[4]
6-757-55-1
Matsuda R.
Jasika O.
6-727-51-0
Basavareddy N.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-3
Svajda Z.[6]
Rybakov A.
6-27-610
Zheng M.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Mayo A.
7-643-66-3
Hussey G.
Bolt A.
6-43-66-3
Suresh D.
Harris B.[5]
6-37-5
Sakamoto R.
Ghibaudo A.
1-66-46-2
Evans D.[3]
Andrade A.
6-36-3
Habib H.[8]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
Tomic B.
Banerjee S.
6-46-4
Spizzirri E.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Cassone M.
6-26-3
Kachmazov A.
Zhukayev B.
7-636-727-61
Lajal M.
Harris L.
7-54-2