Zachary Svajda vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Lexington CH Semi-final

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Zachary Svajda
USA6
Zachary Svajda
#66ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
hard
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#206ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Svajda Z.
6-1 6-3
Hsu Y.
Svajda Z.
662
Hsu Y.
130

Zachary Svajda defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-1 6-3 in the Lexington CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #66.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda Z.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Svajda Z.Hsu Y.
30
Serve
—
12
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Svajda Z.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svajda Z.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
74
Break points won·Dominant
66
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
68
50
Tiebreaks·Even
75
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda Z.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Hsu Y.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+222 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1468
7.5Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1489
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
6.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
3.9
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda Z.Hsu Y.
Freshness·Clear edge
81
100

Svajda Z.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Hsu Y.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[6]
Tomic B.
2-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Tomic B.
Spizzirri E.[2]
6-32-67-63
Svajda Z.[6]
Hsu Y.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tomic B.
Hussey G.
7-656-3
Spizzirri E.[2]
Suresh D.
7-646-4
Svajda Z.[6]
Basavareddy N.[1]
1-67-56-4
Hsu Y.
Zheng M.
6-17-5
R16
Tomic B.
Mejia N.
7-646-3
Suresh D.
Lajal M.
6-746-46-4
Hussey G.
Habib H.[8]
7-676-3
Zheng M.
Evans D.[3]
6-16-3
Hsu Y.
Eubanks C.[7]
6-46-4
Svajda Z.[6]
Matsuda R.
6-16-0
Basavareddy N.[1]
Kachmazov A.
7-56-0
Spizzirri E.[2]
Sakamoto R.
7-656-774-3
R32
Mejia N.
Holmgren A.[4]
6-757-55-1
Matsuda R.
Jasika O.
6-727-51-0
Basavareddy N.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-3
Svajda Z.[6]
Rybakov A.
6-27-610
Zheng M.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Mayo A.
7-643-66-3
Hussey G.
Bolt A.
6-43-66-3
Suresh D.
Harris B.[5]
6-37-5
Sakamoto R.
Ghibaudo A.
1-66-46-2
Evans D.[3]
Andrade A.
6-36-3
Habib H.[8]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
Tomic B.
Banerjee S.
6-46-4
Spizzirri E.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-36-2
Hsu Y.
Cassone M.
6-26-3
Kachmazov A.
Zhukayev B.
7-636-727-61
Lajal M.
Harris L.
7-54-2