Clement Tabur vs Benjamin Hassan — Hagen CH Round of 32

Hagen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
clay
Benjamin Hassan
LBN8
Benjamin Hassan
#463ATP
1451ELO
1452Clay ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
Tabur C.
6-4 6-4
Hassan B.
Tabur C.
662
Hassan B.
440

Clement Tabur defeated Benjamin Hassan 6-4 6-4 in the Hagen CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Clement Tabur edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Hassan B.

Hassan B.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Hassan B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (76 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Hassan B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
68
Break points won·Slight edge
23
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
67
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
45
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Hassan B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3+101 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Clay Elo 1452
7.2Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1451
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
6.9
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Hassan B.
Freshness·Dominant
55
100

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Hassan B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Den Ouden G.[6]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Kym J.[4]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Wallin O.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
7-624-66-3
Kym J.[4]
Mcdonald N.
3-66-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Choinski J.[5]
7-666-4
Wallin O.
Gaubas V.[2]
7-647-610
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Masur D.
6-46-1
Kym J.[4]
Cecchinato M.
6-16-4
Gaubas V.[2]
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Skatov T.
3-66-47-66
Wallin O.
Tabur C.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Popko D.
3-66-16-4
Den Ouden G.[6]
Negritu C.
7-656-746-3
Mcdonald N.
Nagal S.
6-24-66-4
R32
Mcdonald N.
Rodionov J.[9]
6-46-3
Masur D.
Engel J.
7-646-2
Negritu C.
Blanch D.
7-54-66-3
Den Ouden G.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Cecchinato M.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-3
Tabur C.
Hassan B.[8]
6-46-4
Wallin O.
Schoenhaus M.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[5]
Giustino L.
4-66-37-61
Kym J.[4]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Gaubas V.[2]
Midon L.
6-36-726-1
Schwaerzler J.
Kestelboim M.
6-33-67-63
Popko D.
Matusevich A.
3-66-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Mikrut L.
6-46-2
Skatov T.
Donski A.
6-16-3
Nagal S.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Friend J.
7-56-2