Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Michael Geerts — Liberec CH Round of 32

Liberec CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1545Clay ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
clay
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Stebe C.
4-6 7-6 6-3
Geerts M.
Stebe C.
47762
Geerts M.
66231

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Michael Geerts 4-6 7-6 6-3 in the Liberec CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Serve advantage — Geerts M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
75
82
Break points won·Slight edge
10
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stebe C.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Geerts M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+197 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1348
6.9Overall Elo 1556
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
2.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bueno G.
Olivieri G.
6-22-0
Semi-finals
Olivieri G.
Michalski D.
6-37-64
Bueno G.
Gombos N.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Bueno G.
Collarini A.[6]
7-56-2
Gombos N.
Mrva M.
7-54-66-1
Michalski D.
Vacherot V.
7-637-62
Olivieri G.
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
2-66-26-3
R16
Olivieri G.
Barrena A.[5]
6-01-0
Bueno G.
Travaglia S.[4]
6-06-2
Michalski D.
Coria F.[1]
7-51-66-4
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Nicod J.
7-606-4
Gombos N.
Dedura Palomero D.
7-655-77-5
Mrva M.
Martin A.
3-66-46-4
Vacherot V.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.[7]
6-766-37-63
Collarini A.[6]
Stebe C.
6-46-2
R32
Coria F.[1]
Krumich M.
6-23-66-3
Michalski D.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Vacherot V.
Brunclik P.
7-636-4
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Gima S.
4-66-36-1
Olivieri G.
Karol M.
6-36-2
Barrena A.[5]
Kucera J.
6-26-3
Collarini A.[6]
Paulson A.
6-47-66
Stebe C.
Geerts M.
4-67-626-3
Travaglia S.[4]
Molcan A.
4-67-57-63
Mrva M.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
6-26-3
Gombos N.
Blancaneaux G.[8]
1-67-56-1
Dedura Palomero D.
Berrettini J.
6-15-76-3
Nicod J.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-37-5
Bueno G.
Barton H.
6-736-37-5
Martin A.
Vasa E.
7-646-736-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.[7]
Brancaccio R.
6-22-66-3