Vilius Gaubas vs Lautaro Midon — Hagen CH Round of 32

Hagen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LTU2
Vilius Gaubas
#128ATP
1581ELO
1535Clay ELO
$275kYTD
$759kCAREER
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
clay
ARG
Lautaro Midon
1526ELO
1508Clay ELO
22 yrs · 180 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLW
Gaubas V.
6-3 6-7 6-1
Midon L.
Gaubas V.
66262
Midon L.
37711

Vilius Gaubas defeated Lautaro Midon 6-3 6-7 6-1 in the Hagen CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Vilius Gaubas came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaubas V.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Midon L.

Midon L.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gaubas V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaubas V.Midon L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaubas V.Midon L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
38
Break points saved·Dominant
87
28
Break points won·Slight edge
52
63
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaubas V.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Midon L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.4+27 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Clay Elo 1508
6.7Overall Elo 1581
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1526
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
7.1
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gaubas V.Midon L.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
58

Gaubas V.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 73 games (7d) · Midon L.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 89 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Den Ouden G.[6]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Kym J.[4]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Wallin O.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
7-624-66-3
Kym J.[4]
Mcdonald N.
3-66-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Choinski J.[5]
7-666-4
Wallin O.
Gaubas V.[2]
7-647-610
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Masur D.
6-46-1
Kym J.[4]
Cecchinato M.
6-16-4
Gaubas V.[2]
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Skatov T.
3-66-47-66
Wallin O.
Tabur C.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Popko D.
3-66-16-4
Den Ouden G.[6]
Negritu C.
7-656-746-3
Mcdonald N.
Nagal S.
6-24-66-4
R32
Mcdonald N.
Rodionov J.[9]
6-46-3
Masur D.
Engel J.
7-646-2
Negritu C.
Blanch D.
7-54-66-3
Den Ouden G.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Cecchinato M.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-3
Tabur C.
Hassan B.[8]
6-46-4
Wallin O.
Schoenhaus M.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[5]
Giustino L.
4-66-37-61
Kym J.[4]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Gaubas V.[2]
Midon L.
6-36-726-1
Schwaerzler J.
Kestelboim M.
6-33-67-63
Popko D.
Matusevich A.
3-66-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Mikrut L.
6-46-2
Skatov T.
Donski A.
6-16-3
Nagal S.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Friend J.
7-56-2