Madelief Hageman vs Naoko Eto — W15 Savitaipale Round of 16

W15 Savitaipale · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
NED
Madelief Hageman
#809WTA
23 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
clay
JPN
Naoko Eto
#1304WTA
41 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Hageman M.
6-1 6-1
Eto N.
Hageman M.
662
Eto N.
11–

Madelief Hageman defeated Naoko Eto 6-1 6-1 in the W15 Savitaipale round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hageman M.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Eto N.

Eto N.serving15% hold

wins 34% of points on serve vs Hageman M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hageman M.Eto N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
72%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
58%
44%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
45%
31%
Service points won·Clear edge
54%
40%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
37%
Break points saved·Clear edge
51%
37%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.0
0.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hageman M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Eto N.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
0.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hageman M.Eto N.
Freshness·
—
92

Eto N.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 12 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Podlinska M.
Hertel A.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Hertel A.
Chlpac A.
5-77-646-2
Podlinska M.
Silva J.
6-16-0
Quarter-finals
Chlpac A.
Brune Olsen A.
7-6147-5
Podlinska M.
Herrmann S.
6-37-62
Hertel A.
Sziedat F.
7-56-0
Silva J.
Hageman M.
4-66-26-4
R16
Hertel A.
Korpanec Davies A.
6-16-4
Brune Olsen A.
Gudelj V.
6-06-0
Hageman M.
Eto N.
6-16-1
Chlpac A.
Yesypchuk D.
2-67-56-2
Podlinska M.
Ceuca A.
6-06-3
Silva J.
Ghirardato E.
3-66-46-1
Sziedat F.
Kamper E.
6-41-66-0
Herrmann S.
Haavisto E.
6-05-76-1
R32
Ghirardato E.
Fajmonova S.
6-27-68
Podlinska M.
Leon I.
1-66-25-1
Korpanec Davies A.
Koskel A.
2-66-36-4
Hageman M.
Rahnel L.
6-27-65
Ceuca A.
Ahti V.
7-55-4
Herrmann S.
Syrtveit N.
6-36-1
Chlpac A.
Grekul E.
6-06-4
Gudelj V.
Ristola E.
3-66-26-5
Kamper E.
Charalampopoulos D.
6-06-2
Eto N.
Krook K.
6-06-3
Brune Olsen A.
Schaedel L.
6-46-3
Hertel A.
Remander S.
6-46-2
Haavisto E.
Johansson I.
7-57-5
Sziedat F.
Blomqvist C.
7-644-66-2
Yesypchuk D.
Skoog I.
4-3