Jerome Kym vs Kimmer Coppejans — Hagen CH Round of 32

Hagen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI4
Jerome Kym
#186ATP
1599ELO
1529Clay ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
clay
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
Kym J.
6-2 6-3
Coppejans K.
Kym J.
662
Coppejans K.
230

Jerome Kym defeated Kimmer Coppejans 6-2 6-3 in the Hagen CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Coppejans K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Coppejans K.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
3.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Coppejans K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
36
44
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
67
Break points won·Slight edge
21
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Coppejans K.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+16 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Clay Elo 1513
6.2Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1544
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
1.5
0.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Coppejans K.
Freshness·Slight edge
69
76

Kym J.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Den Ouden G.[6]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Kym J.[4]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Wallin O.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
7-624-66-3
Kym J.[4]
Mcdonald N.
3-66-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Choinski J.[5]
7-666-4
Wallin O.
Gaubas V.[2]
7-647-610
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Masur D.
6-46-1
Kym J.[4]
Cecchinato M.
6-16-4
Gaubas V.[2]
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Skatov T.
3-66-47-66
Wallin O.
Tabur C.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Popko D.
3-66-16-4
Den Ouden G.[6]
Negritu C.
7-656-746-3
Mcdonald N.
Nagal S.
6-24-66-4
R32
Mcdonald N.
Rodionov J.[9]
6-46-3
Masur D.
Engel J.
7-646-2
Negritu C.
Blanch D.
7-54-66-3
Den Ouden G.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Cecchinato M.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-3
Tabur C.
Hassan B.[8]
6-46-4
Wallin O.
Schoenhaus M.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[5]
Giustino L.
4-66-37-61
Kym J.[4]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Gaubas V.[2]
Midon L.
6-36-726-1
Schwaerzler J.
Kestelboim M.
6-33-67-63
Popko D.
Matusevich A.
3-66-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Mikrut L.
6-46-2
Skatov T.
Donski A.
6-16-3
Nagal S.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Friend J.
7-56-2