Jana Otzipka vs Berfu Cengiz — W35 Knokke-Heist Round of 32

W35 Knokke-Heist · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BEL
Jana Otzipka
#538WTA
1204ELO
1134Clay ELO
21 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
clay
Berfu Cengiz
TUR
Berfu Cengiz
#355WTA
1400ELO
1381Clay ELO
26 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
Otzipka J.
4-6 6-2 6-4
Cengiz B.
Otzipka J.
4662
Cengiz B.
6241

Jana Otzipka defeated Berfu Cengiz 4-6 6-2 6-4 in the W35 Knokke-Heist round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Otzipka J.serving34% hold

wins 44% of points on serve vs Cengiz B.

Cengiz B.serving41% hold

wins 46% of points on serve vs Otzipka J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Otzipka J.Cengiz B.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
58%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
39%
45%
Service points won·Even
50%
54%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
52%
49%
Aces / match·Even
1.3
1.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
7.4
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (31 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Otzipka J.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Cengiz B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1134
Surface ELO
6.9+248 Clay Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1204
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Papamichail D.
Vrancken Peeters A.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Papamichail D.
Bartashevich Y.
6-37-5
Vrancken Peeters A.
Van Den Broek I.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Bartashevich Y.
Ciric Bagaric L.
6-36-1
Van Den Broek I.
Ebeling Koning L.
1-67-696-4
Vrancken Peeters A.
Hietaranta L.
6-12-66-2
Papamichail D.
Abbagnato A.
6-27-61
R16
Van Den Broek I.
Matoula M.
3-66-26-3
Bartashevich Y.
Craciun G.
6-23-66-3
Papamichail D.
Coppez K.
6-36-3
Abbagnato A.
Di Girolami T.
6-45-5
Ciric Bagaric L.
Hodzic M.
6-47-64
Hietaranta L.
Gadamauri T.
6-16-2
Ebeling Koning L.
Otzipka J.
6-34-4
Vrancken Peeters A.
Van Emst S.
6-46-2
R32
Craciun G.
Guth M.
6-46-2
Bartashevich Y.
Iliev S.
6-27-65
Ciric Bagaric L.
Kotliar Y.
4-67-56-4
Hodzic M.
Groen J.
6-07-5
Van Emst S.
Tubello A.
3-66-36-3
Ebeling Koning L.
Sakellaridi S.
6-36-1
Otzipka J.
Cengiz B.
4-66-26-4
Coppez K.
Maquet M.
6-26-4
Hietaranta L.
Van De Peer V.
6-16-0
Gadamauri T.
Petkovic A.
4-66-36-3
Vrancken Peeters A.
Hobgarski K.
7-656-3
Matoula M.
Kuhl C.
6-42-66-4
Van Den Broek I.
Vlasselaer C.
6-26-2
Abbagnato A.
Van Impe A.
6-15-75-1
Papamichail D.
Lim A.
6-20-0
Di Girolami T.
Yamazaki I.
6-14-66-4