Marco Cecchinato vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Hagen CH Round of 32

Hagen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marco Cecchinato
ITA
Marco Cecchinato
#175ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$149kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2025
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Cecchinato M.
6-2 6-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Cecchinato M.
662
Reis Da Silva J.
230

Marco Cecchinato defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 6-2 6-3 in the Hagen CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cecchinato M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cecchinato M.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cecchinato M.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
12
Break points saved·Dominant
89
49
Break points won·Clear edge
20
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cecchinato M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+76 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Clay Elo 1470
6.0Overall Elo 1576
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1486
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.1
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
5.4
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cecchinato M.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
69
—

Cecchinato M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Den Ouden G.[6]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Kym J.[4]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Wallin O.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Den Ouden G.[6]
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
7-624-66-3
Kym J.[4]
Mcdonald N.
3-66-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Choinski J.[5]
7-666-4
Wallin O.
Gaubas V.[2]
7-647-610
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Masur D.
6-46-1
Kym J.[4]
Cecchinato M.
6-16-4
Gaubas V.[2]
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Skatov T.
3-66-47-66
Wallin O.
Tabur C.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Popko D.
3-66-16-4
Den Ouden G.[6]
Negritu C.
7-656-746-3
Mcdonald N.
Nagal S.
6-24-66-4
R32
Mcdonald N.
Rodionov J.[9]
6-46-3
Masur D.
Engel J.
7-646-2
Negritu C.
Blanch D.
7-54-66-3
Den Ouden G.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Cecchinato M.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-3
Tabur C.
Hassan B.[8]
6-46-4
Wallin O.
Schoenhaus M.
6-26-3
Choinski J.[5]
Giustino L.
4-66-37-61
Kym J.[4]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Gaubas V.[2]
Midon L.
6-36-726-1
Schwaerzler J.
Kestelboim M.
6-33-67-63
Popko D.
Matusevich A.
3-66-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Mikrut L.
6-46-2
Skatov T.
Donski A.
6-16-3
Nagal S.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-2
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Friend J.
7-56-2