Tung Lin Wu vs Li Tu — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 16

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#345ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
hard
AUS7
Li Tu
#421ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Wu T.
3-6 7-6 6-4
Tu L.
Wu T.
37762
Tu L.
66241

Tung Lin Wu defeated Li Tu 3-6 7-6 6-4 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in ranked #345, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu dropped the opening set before beating Li Tu 3–6 7–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Tu L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
7.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
27
Break points saved·Even
84
82
Break points won·Even
6
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
6
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Tu L.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
6.1+95 Hard Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1488
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
1.5
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Tu L.
Freshness·
85
—

Wu T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Martin A.
6-777-57-69
Semi-finals
Martin A.
Spizzirri E.[5]
6-17-65
Lajal M.
Hsu Y.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Lajal M.
Fery A.
6-15-76-3
Martin A.
Galarneau A.
4-67-666-1
Hsu Y.
Wu T.
7-653-67-64
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
R16
Hsu Y.
Mayo A.
6-36-2
Wu T.
Tu L.[7]
3-67-626-4
Lajal M.
Holmgren A.[6]
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zheng M.
6-44-67-64
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Zhou Y.
Eubanks C.[4]
7-656-1
Fery A.
Blockx A.[3]
6-46-3
Galarneau A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
R32
Spizzirri E.[5]
Sakamoto R.
3-66-36-4
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-56-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-737-646-3
Galarneau A.
Kypson P.
6-46-726-3
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-06-3
Shimizu Y.
Mejia N.
6-46-2
Tu L.[7]
Kotzen N.
4-66-36-4
Mayo A.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-2
Blockx A.[3]
Huang T.
6-26-1
Zhou Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-35-76-4
Fery A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-2
Martin A.
Habib H.[8]
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Basavareddy N.[1]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Maloney P.
7-6116-2
Holmgren A.[6]
Johns G.
6-16-4
Noguchi R.
Mochizuki S.[2]
6-40-0