Li Tu vs Nicolas Ian Kotzen — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 32

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS7
Li Tu
#421ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
hard
USA
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
#936ATP
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
L
Tu L.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Kotzen N.
Tu L.
4662
Kotzen N.
6341

Li Tu defeated Nicolas Ian Kotzen 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kotzen N.

Kotzen N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve advantage — Tu L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Kotzen N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
50%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
74%
50%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
56%
Service points won·Clear edge
65%
53%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Clear edge
59%
71%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kotzen N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Martin A.
6-777-57-69
Semi-finals
Martin A.
Spizzirri E.[5]
6-17-65
Lajal M.
Hsu Y.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Lajal M.
Fery A.
6-15-76-3
Martin A.
Galarneau A.
4-67-666-1
Hsu Y.
Wu T.
7-653-67-64
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
R16
Hsu Y.
Mayo A.
6-36-2
Wu T.
Tu L.[7]
3-67-626-4
Lajal M.
Holmgren A.[6]
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zheng M.
6-44-67-64
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Zhou Y.
Eubanks C.[4]
7-656-1
Fery A.
Blockx A.[3]
6-46-3
Galarneau A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
R32
Spizzirri E.[5]
Sakamoto R.
3-66-36-4
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-56-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-737-646-3
Galarneau A.
Kypson P.
6-46-726-3
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-06-3
Shimizu Y.
Mejia N.
6-46-2
Tu L.[7]
Kotzen N.
4-66-36-4
Mayo A.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-2
Blockx A.[3]
Huang T.
6-26-1
Zhou Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-35-76-4
Fery A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-2
Martin A.
Habib H.[8]
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Basavareddy N.[1]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Maloney P.
7-6116-2
Holmgren A.[6]
Johns G.
6-16-4
Noguchi R.
Mochizuki S.[2]
6-40-0