Sumit Nagal vs Nicolas Kicker — Tampere CH Quarter-final

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#327ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Nagal S.
6-4 6-3
Kicker N.
Nagal S.
662
Kicker N.
430

Sumit Nagal defeated Nicolas Kicker 6-4 6-3 in the Tampere CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Sumit Nagal came in ranked #219, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sumit Nagal extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-01Buenos AiresQ3claySumit Nagal2-6 6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Even
69%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Even
1.4
1.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Even
33
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
56
Break points won·Slight edge
35
45
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kicker N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+164 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Clay Elo 1373
6.7Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1385
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.2
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.7
Minutes 14d
3.0
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Kicker N.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
100

Nagal S.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Kicker N.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Budkov Kjaer N.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-656-726-2
Semi-finals
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Nagal S.
7-56-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Barton H.
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Budkov Kjaer N.
Erhard M.
6-04-0
Barton H.
Cina F.[7]
6-23-66-2
Nagal S.
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Bailly G.
6-36-4
R16
Budkov Kjaer N.
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
7-56-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
6-26-4
Bailly G.
Faurel T.
6-46-4
Barton H.
Rincon D.[3]
4-66-26-1
Kicker N.
Durasovic V.[5]
3-66-36-4
Cina F.[7]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Erhard M.
Onclin G.[2]
6-27-5
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-3
R32
Faurel T.
Skatov T.
7-624-0
Nagal S.
Clarke J.[1]
7-646-1
Houkes M.
Ahti V.
6-27-5
Kicker N.
Geerts M.
6-23-66-1
Durasovic V.[5]
Zahraj P.
6-36-747-5
Bailly G.
Popko D.[4]
6-36-2
Gakhov I.
Molcan A.
6-44-66-2
Erhard M.
Paldanius O.
6-36-1
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
Vasa E.
7-646-3
Budkov Kjaer N.
Barrena A.
6-36-2
Cina F.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Coppejans K.[6]
6-33-66-4
Onclin G.[2]
Thanos A.
6-46-3
Rincon D.[3]
Negritu C.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Bueno G.
6-26-2
Barton H.
Michalski D.
6-16-3