Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Tung Lin Wu — Bloomfield Hills CH Quarter-final

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#206ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#345ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
Hsu Y.
7-6 3-6 7-6
Wu T.
Hsu Y.
773772
Wu T.
656641

Yu Hsiou Hsu defeated Tung Lin Wu 7-6 3-6 7-6 in the Bloomfield Hills CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Yu Hsiou Hsu closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hsu Y.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hsu Y.Wu T.
1st serve in·Even
66%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hsu Y.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
84
Break points won·Even
4
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hsu Y.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Wu T.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+93 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1376
6.0Overall Elo 1489
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1406
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.8
Surface form
1.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
4.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hsu Y.Wu T.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
83

Hsu Y.: 19 days rest · Wu T.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Martin A.
6-777-57-69
Semi-finals
Martin A.
Spizzirri E.[5]
6-17-65
Lajal M.
Hsu Y.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Lajal M.
Fery A.
6-15-76-3
Martin A.
Galarneau A.
4-67-666-1
Hsu Y.
Wu T.
7-653-67-64
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
R16
Hsu Y.
Mayo A.
6-36-2
Wu T.
Tu L.[7]
3-67-626-4
Lajal M.
Holmgren A.[6]
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zheng M.
6-44-67-64
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Zhou Y.
Eubanks C.[4]
7-656-1
Fery A.
Blockx A.[3]
6-46-3
Galarneau A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
R32
Spizzirri E.[5]
Sakamoto R.
3-66-36-4
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-56-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-737-646-3
Galarneau A.
Kypson P.
6-46-726-3
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-06-3
Shimizu Y.
Mejia N.
6-46-2
Tu L.[7]
Kotzen N.
4-66-36-4
Mayo A.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-2
Blockx A.[3]
Huang T.
6-26-1
Zhou Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-35-76-4
Fery A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-2
Martin A.
Habib H.[8]
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Basavareddy N.[1]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Maloney P.
7-6116-2
Holmgren A.[6]
Johns G.
6-16-4
Noguchi R.
Mochizuki S.[2]
6-40-0