Mark Lajal vs Arthur Fery — Bloomfield Hills CH Quarter-final

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
EST
Mark Lajal
#164ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
hard
GBR
Arthur Fery
#114ATP
1721ELO
1685Hard ELO
$329kYTD
$868kCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWLW
Lajal M.
6-1 5-7 6-3
Fery A.
Lajal M.
6562
Fery A.
1731

Mark Lajal defeated Arthur Fery 6-1 5-7 6-3 in the Bloomfield Hills CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Fery came in ranked #114.

Key context

  • Match story: Mark Lajal came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lajal M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fery A.

Fery A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Serve advantage — Fery A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lajal M.Fery A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
55%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.9
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lajal M.Fery A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
61
Break points saved·Even
89
85
Break points won·Clear edge
13
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lajal M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Fery A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.5Hard Elo 1556
Surface ELO
6.5+128 Hard Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1589
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1721
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lajal M.Fery A.
Freshness·Dominant
81
41

Lajal M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Fery A.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 168 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Martin A.
6-777-57-69
Semi-finals
Martin A.
Spizzirri E.[5]
6-17-65
Lajal M.
Hsu Y.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Lajal M.
Fery A.
6-15-76-3
Martin A.
Galarneau A.
4-67-666-1
Hsu Y.
Wu T.
7-653-67-64
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
R16
Hsu Y.
Mayo A.
6-36-2
Wu T.
Tu L.[7]
3-67-626-4
Lajal M.
Holmgren A.[6]
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zheng M.
6-44-67-64
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Zhou Y.
Eubanks C.[4]
7-656-1
Fery A.
Blockx A.[3]
6-46-3
Galarneau A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
R32
Spizzirri E.[5]
Sakamoto R.
3-66-36-4
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-56-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-737-646-3
Galarneau A.
Kypson P.
6-46-726-3
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-06-3
Shimizu Y.
Mejia N.
6-46-2
Tu L.[7]
Kotzen N.
4-66-36-4
Mayo A.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-2
Blockx A.[3]
Huang T.
6-26-1
Zhou Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-35-76-4
Fery A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-2
Martin A.
Habib H.[8]
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Basavareddy N.[1]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Maloney P.
7-6116-2
Holmgren A.[6]
Johns G.
6-16-4
Noguchi R.
Mochizuki S.[2]
6-40-0