Christopher Eubanks vs Yasutaka Uchiyama — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 32

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA4
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
hard
Yasutaka Uchiyama
JPN
Yasutaka Uchiyama
#336ATP
1463ELO
1431Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Eubanks C.
6-7 7-6 6-3
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.
637762
Uchiyama Y.
776431

Christopher Eubanks defeated Yasutaka Uchiyama 6-7 7-6 6-3 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eubanks C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Uchiyama Y.

Uchiyama Y.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Eubanks C.Uchiyama Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
32%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.4
7.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (43 vs 72). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Eubanks C.Uchiyama Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
91
Break points won·Even
3
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
67
45
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eubanks C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Uchiyama Y.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+62 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1431
5.5Overall Elo 1523
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1463
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Martin A.
6-777-57-69
Semi-finals
Martin A.
Spizzirri E.[5]
6-17-65
Lajal M.
Hsu Y.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Lajal M.
Fery A.
6-15-76-3
Martin A.
Galarneau A.
4-67-666-1
Hsu Y.
Wu T.
7-653-67-64
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zhou Y.
6-16-2
R16
Hsu Y.
Mayo A.
6-36-2
Wu T.
Tu L.[7]
3-67-626-4
Lajal M.
Holmgren A.[6]
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.[5]
Zheng M.
6-44-67-64
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Zhou Y.
Eubanks C.[4]
7-656-1
Fery A.
Blockx A.[3]
6-46-3
Galarneau A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
R32
Spizzirri E.[5]
Sakamoto R.
3-66-36-4
Zheng M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-56-2
Eubanks C.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-737-646-3
Galarneau A.
Kypson P.
6-46-726-3
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-06-3
Shimizu Y.
Mejia N.
6-46-2
Tu L.[7]
Kotzen N.
4-66-36-4
Mayo A.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-2
Blockx A.[3]
Huang T.
6-26-1
Zhou Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-35-76-4
Fery A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-2
Martin A.
Habib H.[8]
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Basavareddy N.[1]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Maloney P.
7-6116-2
Holmgren A.[6]
Johns G.
6-16-4
Noguchi R.
Mochizuki S.[2]
6-40-0