Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva vs Gonzalo Bueno — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#236ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
clay
PER
Gonzalo Bueno
#182ATP
1491ELO
1469Clay ELO
$136kYTD
$352kCAREER
22 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLLL
Reis Da Silva J.
6-2 6-2
Bueno G.
Reis Da Silva J.
662
Bueno G.
220

Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva defeated Gonzalo Bueno 6-2 6-2 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Reis Da Silva J.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bueno G.

Bueno G.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Reis Da Silva J.Bueno G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
43%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Reis Da Silva J.Bueno G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
29
Break points won·Even
43
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
17
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Reis Da Silva J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Bueno G.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5+1 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.5Clay Elo 1469
4.5Overall Elo 1486
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1491
7.7No prior meetings
H2H
2.3
5.2
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
4.9
4.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Reis Da Silva J.Bueno G.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
94

Reis Da Silva J.: 19 days rest · Bueno G.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Budkov Kjaer N.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-656-726-2
Semi-finals
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Nagal S.
7-56-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Barton H.
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Budkov Kjaer N.
Erhard M.
6-04-0
Barton H.
Cina F.[7]
6-23-66-2
Nagal S.
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Bailly G.
6-36-4
R16
Budkov Kjaer N.
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
7-56-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
6-26-4
Bailly G.
Faurel T.
6-46-4
Barton H.
Rincon D.[3]
4-66-26-1
Kicker N.
Durasovic V.[5]
3-66-36-4
Cina F.[7]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Erhard M.
Onclin G.[2]
6-27-5
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-3
R32
Faurel T.
Skatov T.
7-624-0
Nagal S.
Clarke J.[1]
7-646-1
Houkes M.
Ahti V.
6-27-5
Kicker N.
Geerts M.
6-23-66-1
Durasovic V.[5]
Zahraj P.
6-36-747-5
Bailly G.
Popko D.[4]
6-36-2
Gakhov I.
Molcan A.
6-44-66-2
Erhard M.
Paldanius O.
6-36-1
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
Vasa E.
7-646-3
Budkov Kjaer N.
Barrena A.
6-36-2
Cina F.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Coppejans K.[6]
6-33-66-4
Onclin G.[2]
Thanos A.
6-46-3
Rincon D.[3]
Negritu C.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Bueno G.
6-26-2
Barton H.
Michalski D.
6-16-3