Xin Yu Wang vs Sara Bejlek — Prague Quarter-final

Prague · WTA · Quarter-final
CHN4
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1634Clay ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
clay
Sara Bejlek
CZE
Sara Bejlek
#45WTA
1776ELO
1724Clay ELO
$575kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
20 yrs · 163 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLL
Wang X.
6-4 6-1
Bejlek S.
Wang X.
662
Bejlek S.
410

Xin Yu Wang defeated Sara Bejlek 6-4 6-1 in the Prague quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sara Bejlek came in defending last year's round of 32, but Xin Yu Wang had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 6 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Bejlek S.

Bejlek S.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Wang X.Bejlek S.
—
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Bejlek S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
71%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
49%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Bejlek S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
60
79
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
77
Break points won·Clear edge
78
97
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Bejlek S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 42 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
3.4Clay Elo 1634
Surface ELO
6.6+91 Clay Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1760
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1776
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
7.8
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Country comfort
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wang X.Bejlek S.
Freshness·
—
98

Bejlek S.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
26°COvercast
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 50%

Draw

Final
Bouzkova M.[5]
Noskova L.[1]
2-66-16-3
Semi-finals
Bouzkova M.[5]
Valentova T.
6-47-5
Noskova L.[1]
Wang X.[4]
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Bouzkova M.[5]
Li A.[9]
3-66-36-3
Wang X.[4]
Bejlek S.
6-46-1
Noskova L.[1]
Siniakova K.
6-24-66-3
Valentova T.
Ponchet J.
6-26-0
R16
Valentova T.
Sramkova R.[2]
7-617-5
Noskova L.[1]
Cocciaretto E.
6-26-4
Li A.[9]
Jeanjean L.
6-46-3
Ponchet J.
Palicova B.
6-17-5
Bouzkova M.[5]
Stefanini L.
6-46-4
Bejlek S.
Parks A.[8]
7-696-3
Wang X.[4]
Havlickova L.
3-67-57-66
Siniakova K.
Salkova D.
7-646-3
R32
Havlickova L.
Kovackova A.
7-56-1
Jeanjean L.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-32-0
Noskova L.[1]
Gasanova A.
7-657-67
Ponchet J.
Stojanovic N.
4-67-56-1
Stefanini L.
Tomova V.
6-17-63
Salkova D.
Samson L.
6-36-3
Palicova B.
Hon P.
6-23-66-3
Cocciaretto E.
Golubic V.
6-26-3
Sramkova R.[2]
Maleckova J.
6-34-66-4
Valentova T.
Ito A.
6-26-0
Li A.[9]
Sharma A.
7-616-3
Bouzkova M.[5]
Gao X.
6-06-2
Parks A.[8]
Hontama M.
6-46-2
Bejlek S.
Uchijima M.
7-56-2
Wang X.[4]
Dart H.
6-36-3
Siniakova K.
Ruse E.[7]
7-56-2