Hynek Barton vs Daniel Michalski — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CZE
Hynek Barton
#256ATP
1570ELO
1535Clay ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2025
clay
Daniel Michalski
POL
Daniel Michalski
#302ATP
1435ELO
1386Clay ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Barton H.
6-1 6-3
Michalski D.
Barton H.
662
Michalski D.
130

Hynek Barton defeated Daniel Michalski 6-1 6-3 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Hynek Barton came in ranked #256, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barton H.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Michalski D.

Michalski D.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Barton H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barton H.Michalski D.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barton H.Michalski D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
38
30
Break points saved·Dominant
79
24
Break points won·Clear edge
6
26
Deciding sets·Even
71
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
28
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barton H.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Michalski D.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+149 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Clay Elo 1386
5.7Overall Elo 1570
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1435
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
5.7
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Barton H.Michalski D.
Freshness·Clear edge
93
80

Barton H.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Michalski D.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Budkov Kjaer N.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-656-726-2
Semi-finals
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Nagal S.
7-56-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Barton H.
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Budkov Kjaer N.
Erhard M.
6-04-0
Barton H.
Cina F.[7]
6-23-66-2
Nagal S.
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Bailly G.
6-36-4
R16
Budkov Kjaer N.
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
7-56-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
6-26-4
Bailly G.
Faurel T.
6-46-4
Barton H.
Rincon D.[3]
4-66-26-1
Kicker N.
Durasovic V.[5]
3-66-36-4
Cina F.[7]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Erhard M.
Onclin G.[2]
6-27-5
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-3
R32
Faurel T.
Skatov T.
7-624-0
Nagal S.
Clarke J.[1]
7-646-1
Houkes M.
Ahti V.
6-27-5
Kicker N.
Geerts M.
6-23-66-1
Durasovic V.[5]
Zahraj P.
6-36-747-5
Bailly G.
Popko D.[4]
6-36-2
Gakhov I.
Molcan A.
6-44-66-2
Erhard M.
Paldanius O.
6-36-1
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
Vasa E.
7-646-3
Budkov Kjaer N.
Barrena A.
6-36-2
Cina F.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Coppejans K.[6]
6-33-66-4
Onclin G.[2]
Thanos A.
6-46-3
Rincon D.[3]
Negritu C.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Bueno G.
6-26-2
Barton H.
Michalski D.
6-16-3