Harmony Tan vs Yuriko Miyazaki — W50 Nottingham Quarter-final

W50 Nottingham · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Harmony Tan
FRA
Harmony Tan
#200WTA
1585ELO
1547Hard ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
hard
Yuriko Miyazaki
GBR
Yuriko Miyazaki
1388ELO
1370Hard ELO
30 yrs · 165 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWW
Tan H.
7-6 2-6 6-3
Miyazaki Y.
Tan H.
78262
Miyazaki Y.
66631

Harmony Tan defeated Yuriko Miyazaki 7-6 2-6 6-3 in the W50 Nottingham quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Harmony Tan closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tan H.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Miyazaki Y.

Miyazaki Y.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Tan H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tan H.Miyazaki Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
47%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tan H.Miyazaki Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
39
22
Break points saved·Dominant
71
34
Break points won·Slight edge
74
79
Deciding sets·Slight edge
23
30
Tiebreaks·
76
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tan H.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Miyazaki Y.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+177 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1370
6.4Overall Elo 1585
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1388
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
7.0
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
4.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tan H.Miyazaki Y.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Tan H.: 16 days rest · Miyazaki Y.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zhang S.
Tan H.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Zhang S.
Valdmannova V.
6-46-0
Tan H.
Stoiber R.
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Valdmannova V.
Koshiishi A.
6-06-1
Zhang S.
Rajecki A.
6-16-3
Tan H.
Miyazaki Y.
7-662-66-3
Stoiber R.
Bolkvadze M.
2-0
R16
Zhang S.
Weckerle M.
6-16-0
Valdmannova V.
Dunne K.
6-46-746-2
Stoiber R.
Spink I.
4-67-646-4
Miyazaki Y.
Gillan A.
6-36-3
Koshiishi A.
Veldman K.
6-46-2
Bolkvadze M.
Snells J.
6-16-0
Rajecki A.
Bush T.
6-06-4
Tan H.
Bains N.
7-56-3
R32
Stoiber R.
Banks A.
5-4
Dunne K.
Newberry L.
4-66-24-3
Valdmannova V.
Kaji H.
6-46-0
Bolkvadze M.
Conway J.
6-16-3
Weckerle M.
Hutchinson H.
6-06-2
Zhang S.
Daley D.
6-16-1
Tan H.
Allen V.
6-16-4
Snells J.
Rajeshwaran Revathi M.
6-26-3
Veldman K.
Zhang R.
7-56-2
Spink I.
Shaw E.
6-16-2
Rajecki A.
Oluwadare H.
6-16-2
Miyazaki Y.
Bissett A.
6-26-1
Bains N.
Vlasselaer C.
6-47-61
Gillan A.
Turini V.
6-37-5
Bush T.
Musetti L.
6-06-0