Jesper De Jong vs Vit Kopriva — Bastad Round of 16

Bastad · ATP · Round of 16
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
Vit Kopriva
CZE8
Vit Kopriva
#64ATP
1740ELO
1699Clay ELO
$805kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWLW
De Jong J.
7-6 7-5
Kopriva V.
De Jong J.
7772
Kopriva V.
6350

Jesper De Jong defeated Vit Kopriva 7-6 7-5 in the Bastad round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Vit Kopriva came in ranked #64, but Jesper De Jong had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 5 on clay. Jesper De Jong extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-23Roland GarrosQ1clayJesper De Jong6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kopriva V.

Kopriva V.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Kopriva V.
49
Serve
20
32
Return
56

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Kopriva V.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Kopriva V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
83
Break points won·Dominant
37
66
Deciding sets·Clear edge
69
90
Tiebreaks·Even
57
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Kopriva V.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1696
Surface ELO
6.1+4 Clay Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1740
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
5.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
7.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
0.0
Prev. match
2.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Kopriva V.
Freshness·Slight edge
92
97

De Jong J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Kopriva V.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°CDrizzle
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 69%
Final
Darderi L.[2]
De Jong J.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Darderi L.[2]
Cerundolo F.[1]
6-23-67-63
De Jong J.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Darderi L.[2]
Baez S.[8]
6-06-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor T.[2]
4-67-636-3
Cerundolo F.[1]
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-03-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Misolic F.
6-37-5
R16
Cerundolo F.[1]
Navone M.[4]
6-36-3
Darderi L.[2]
Ymer E.
6-26-2
Misolic F.
Borges N.[5]
3-67-616-3
Griekspoor T.[2]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-666-3
De Jong J.
Kopriva V.[8]
7-637-5
Dzumhur D.[7]
Gaston H.
4-66-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
7-635-76-3
Baez S.[8]
Budkov Kjaer N.
3-66-27-5
R32
Darderi L.[2]
Collignon R.
6-22-66-2
Misolic F.
Moller E.[1]
6-33-67-5
Navone M.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
7-57-5
Kopriva V.[8]
Dellien H.
6-13-0
Gaston H.
Tseng C.
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[7]
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Budkov Kjaer N.
Monteiro T.
5-76-37-62
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
Ymer M.
6-46-1
De Jong J.
Rejchtman Vinciguerra W.
6-36-2
Ymer E.
Boyer T.
6-33-66-2
Pellegrino A.
Faria J.
2-66-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Garin C.
6-46-4