Luciano Darderi vs Jesper De Jong — Bastad Final

Bastad · ATP · Final
Luciano Darderi
ITA2
Luciano Darderi
#16ATP
1835ELO
1836Clay ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Darderi L.
6-4 3-6 6-3
De Jong J.
Darderi L.
6362
De Jong J.
4631

Luciano Darderi defeated Jesper De Jong 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Bastad final on clay. The result followed the form book — Luciano Darderi came in ranked #16.

Key context

  • Match story: Luciano Darderi closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Darderi L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Darderi L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Darderi L.De Jong J.
52
Serve
49
73
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Darderi L.De Jong J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.8
6.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Darderi L.De Jong J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
78
56
Break points saved·Even
94
90
Break points won·Clear edge
50
37
Deciding sets·Clear edge
93
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Darderi L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
De Jong J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.9+140 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1696
6.7Overall Elo 1835
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1711
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
5.2
Fatigue & Travel
4.6
Minutes 14d
6.0
0.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
0.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Darderi L.De Jong J.
Freshness·Slight edge
97
90

Darderi L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · De Jong J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°CDrizzle
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 69%
Final
Darderi L.[2]
De Jong J.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Darderi L.[2]
Cerundolo F.[1]
6-23-67-63
De Jong J.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Darderi L.[2]
Baez S.[8]
6-06-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor T.[2]
4-67-636-3
Cerundolo F.[1]
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-03-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Misolic F.
6-37-5
R16
Cerundolo F.[1]
Navone M.[4]
6-36-3
Darderi L.[2]
Ymer E.
6-26-2
Misolic F.
Borges N.[5]
3-67-616-3
Griekspoor T.[2]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-666-3
De Jong J.
Kopriva V.[8]
7-637-5
Dzumhur D.[7]
Gaston H.
4-66-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
7-635-76-3
Baez S.[8]
Budkov Kjaer N.
3-66-27-5
R32
Darderi L.[2]
Collignon R.
6-22-66-2
Misolic F.
Moller E.[1]
6-33-67-5
Navone M.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
7-57-5
Kopriva V.[8]
Dellien H.
6-13-0
Gaston H.
Tseng C.
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[7]
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Budkov Kjaer N.
Monteiro T.
5-76-37-62
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
Ymer M.
6-46-1
De Jong J.
Rejchtman Vinciguerra W.
6-36-2
Ymer E.
Boyer T.
6-33-66-2
Pellegrino A.
Faria J.
2-66-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Garin C.
6-46-4