Kaja Juvan vs Louisa Chirico — Hamburg Round of 16

Hamburg · WTA · Round of 16
Kaja Juvan
SLO
Kaja Juvan
#140WTA
1696ELO
1685Clay ELO
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
Louisa Chirico
USA
Louisa Chirico
#382WTA
1476ELO
1516Clay ELO
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Juvan K.
4-6 6-4 6-1
Chirico L.
Juvan K.
4662
Chirico L.
6411

Kaja Juvan defeated Louisa Chirico 4-6 6-4 6-1 in the Hamburg round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Kaja Juvan came in ranked #140.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Juvan K.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Chirico L.

Chirico L.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Juvan K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Juvan K.Chirico L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
54%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
1.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
5.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Juvan K.Chirico L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
56
46
Break points won·Clear edge
95
74
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
33
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Juvan K.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Chirico L.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.4+169 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1516
8.0Overall Elo 1696
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1476
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
6.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boisson L.[5]
Bondar A.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Bondar A.[7]
Juvan K.
5-76-36-4
Boisson L.[5]
Yastremska D.[2]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Boisson L.[5]
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Juvan K.
Romero Gormaz L.
6-46-756-4
Bondar A.[7]
Alexandrova E.[1]
6-716-37-64
Yastremska D.[2]
Galfi D.
7-613-66-2
R16
Boisson L.[5]
Korpatsch T.
6-46-736-4
Galfi D.
Schunk N.
1-66-36-2
Romero Gormaz L.
Rus A.
6-26-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Uebelhoer C.
6-26-2
Juvan K.
Chirico L.
4-66-46-1
Yastremska D.[2]
Parry D.
6-16-4
Bondar A.[7]
Kraus S.
6-36-2
Tomova V.
Sharma A.
6-16-1
R32
Chirico L.
Sherif M.[8]
4-67-53-0
Boisson L.[5]
Grabher J.
6-16-3
Sharma A.
Geerlings A.
7-643-66-2
Romero Gormaz L.
Fossa Huergo N.
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.[1]
Vedder E.
6-06-3
Uebelhoer C.
Steiner V.
7-646-2
Kraus S.
Cengiz B.
4-67-56-4
Bondar A.[7]
Noha Akugue N.
6-43-67-63
Juvan K.
Timofeeva M.
7-646-1
Galfi D.
Krunic A.
6-46-1
Korpatsch T.
Serban R.
6-46-3
Schunk N.
Uchijima M.[6]
7-56-3
Tomova V.
Maria T.[3]
6-37-65
Rus A.
Nahimana S.
6-26-1
Parry D.
Wurth T.
7-693-67-5
Yastremska D.[2]
Niemeier J.
6-46-3