Filip Misolic vs Nuno Borges — Bastad Round of 16

Bastad · ATP · Round of 16
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
Nuno Borges
POR5
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1726Clay ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Misolic F.
3-6 7-6 6-3
Borges N.
Misolic F.
37762
Borges N.
66131

Filip Misolic defeated Nuno Borges 3-6 7-6 6-3 in the Bastad round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nuno Borges came in ranked #52, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Misolic F.Borges N.
—
Serve
28
—
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Borges N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
6.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Even
79
77
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
98
Break points won·Even
53
54
Deciding sets·Even
94
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Borges N.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 1664
Surface ELO
5.2+62 Clay Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1769
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
4.7
0.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
2.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Misolic F.Borges N.
Freshness·
—
93

Borges N.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°CDrizzle
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 69%
Final
Darderi L.[2]
De Jong J.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Darderi L.[2]
Cerundolo F.[1]
6-23-67-63
De Jong J.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Darderi L.[2]
Baez S.[8]
6-06-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor T.[2]
4-67-636-3
Cerundolo F.[1]
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-03-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Misolic F.
6-37-5
R16
Cerundolo F.[1]
Navone M.[4]
6-36-3
Darderi L.[2]
Ymer E.
6-26-2
Misolic F.
Borges N.[5]
3-67-616-3
Griekspoor T.[2]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-666-3
De Jong J.
Kopriva V.[8]
7-637-5
Dzumhur D.[7]
Gaston H.
4-66-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
7-635-76-3
Baez S.[8]
Budkov Kjaer N.
3-66-27-5
R32
Darderi L.[2]
Collignon R.
6-22-66-2
Misolic F.
Moller E.[1]
6-33-67-5
Navone M.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
7-57-5
Kopriva V.[8]
Dellien H.
6-13-0
Gaston H.
Tseng C.
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[7]
Ofner S.
6-46-4
Budkov Kjaer N.
Monteiro T.
5-76-37-62
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
Ymer M.
6-46-1
De Jong J.
Rejchtman Vinciguerra W.
6-36-2
Ymer E.
Boyer T.
6-33-66-2
Pellegrino A.
Faria J.
2-66-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Garin C.
6-46-4