Anna Bondar vs Kaja Juvan — Hamburg Semi-final

Hamburg · WTA · Semi-final
Anna Bondar
HUN7
Anna Bondar
#73WTA
1735ELO
1734Clay ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
Kaja Juvan
SLO
Kaja Juvan
#140WTA
1696ELO
1685Clay ELO
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
Bondar A.
5-7 6-3 6-4
Juvan K.
Bondar A.
5662
Juvan K.
7341

Anna Bondar defeated Kaja Juvan 5-7 6-3 6-4 in the Hamburg semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Anna Bondar came in ranked #73.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bondar A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Juvan K.

Juvan K.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Serve advantage — Juvan K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Bondar A.Juvan K.
54
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bondar A.Juvan K.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bondar A.Juvan K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
51
58
Break points saved·Dominant
88
56
Break points won·Clear edge
77
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
78
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bondar A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Juvan K.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+49 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Clay Elo 1685
5.7Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1696
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
8.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bondar A.Juvan K.
Freshness·
97
—

Bondar A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boisson L.[5]
Bondar A.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Bondar A.[7]
Juvan K.
5-76-36-4
Boisson L.[5]
Yastremska D.[2]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Boisson L.[5]
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Juvan K.
Romero Gormaz L.
6-46-756-4
Bondar A.[7]
Alexandrova E.[1]
6-716-37-64
Yastremska D.[2]
Galfi D.
7-613-66-2
R16
Boisson L.[5]
Korpatsch T.
6-46-736-4
Galfi D.
Schunk N.
1-66-36-2
Romero Gormaz L.
Rus A.
6-26-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Uebelhoer C.
6-26-2
Juvan K.
Chirico L.
4-66-46-1
Yastremska D.[2]
Parry D.
6-16-4
Bondar A.[7]
Kraus S.
6-36-2
Tomova V.
Sharma A.
6-16-1
R32
Chirico L.
Sherif M.[8]
4-67-53-0
Boisson L.[5]
Grabher J.
6-16-3
Sharma A.
Geerlings A.
7-643-66-2
Romero Gormaz L.
Fossa Huergo N.
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.[1]
Vedder E.
6-06-3
Uebelhoer C.
Steiner V.
7-646-2
Kraus S.
Cengiz B.
4-67-56-4
Bondar A.[7]
Noha Akugue N.
6-43-67-63
Juvan K.
Timofeeva M.
7-646-1
Galfi D.
Krunic A.
6-46-1
Korpatsch T.
Serban R.
6-46-3
Schunk N.
Uchijima M.[6]
7-56-3
Tomova V.
Maria T.[3]
6-37-65
Rus A.
Nahimana S.
6-26-1
Parry D.
Wurth T.
7-693-67-5
Yastremska D.[2]
Niemeier J.
6-46-3